Secondary active transporters use the energy from electrochemical ion gradients and/or substrate gradients to mediate concentrative substrate translocation across biological membranes of all organisms. With advances in membrane protein structural biology, it has become clear that a large number of secondary active symporters and exchangers, which belong to distant families without discernable sequence identity, nonetheless, share common structural features that classify them into a single structural family, known as the LeuT-fold. This fold is characterized by 10 transmembrane helices (TMs) organized into two inverted structural repeats each containing 5 TMs. In Bridge 3 we seek to understand commonalities as well as divergence in the functional mechanisms of the LeuT-fold proteins, with a focus on the general rules of protein structural dynamics that underlie function, in the context of differences in their driving mechanism and the conformational changes associated with substrate translocation. To achieve these goals we build on the synergistic approach we have established with the study of LeuT, employing iterative computational, functional and spectroscopic methods. The working hypothesis of this Bridge is that the discovery and interpretation of mechanistic differences between LeuT and other LeuT-fold transporters depends on revealing dynamic properties enabled by local structural differences. We will use a new generation of quantitative computational approaches, in parallel with binding and flux studies, and with EPR and single-molecule fluorescence studies to measure distance between pairs of probes in different conformational states as well as the dynamics of the associated movements. The work will take advantage of specific established collaborations among the team members, and with the Computational Modeling, Spectroscopy and Instrumentation, and Protein Expression Cores. ApcT, a member of the APC family that also includes product/precursor exchangers, shares the LeuT-fold but has been reported to be a H+-dependent amino acid transporter. Interestingly, ApcT has the side chain ?-amino group of Lys158 occupying what is the Na2 site in LeuT, and it has been suggested that protonation and deprotonation of this Lys, like binding and unbinding of Na2 in LeuT, drives transport. In contrast to the profound mechanistic differences between ApcT and LeuT, the Drosophila dopamine transporter (dDAT) is closely related to LeuT in overall structure and function but differentiated by the presence of large amino and carboxy termini, which have been shown to critically modulate transporter function in the eukaryotic transporters. To understand similarities and differences in functional mechanisms for these compared LeuT- fold transporters we propose the following Specific Aims: 1) To determine how substrates, H+ and Na+ coordinate dynamics and conformational changes in the transport cycle of ApcT as compared with LeuT. 2) To integrate CW and DEER measurements in exploring the role of the amino terminus in modulating the conformational dynamics of dDAT.
Wen, Po-Chao; Mahinthichaichan, Paween; Trebesch, Noah et al. (2018) Microscopic view of lipids and their diverse biological functions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 51:177-186 |
Ren, Zhenning; Lee, Jumin; Moosa, Mahdi Muhammad et al. (2018) Structure of an EIIC sugar transporter trapped in an inward-facing conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:5962-5967 |
Razavi, Asghar M; Khelashvili, George; Weinstein, Harel (2018) How structural elements evolving from bacterial to human SLC6 transporters enabled new functional properties. BMC Biol 16:31 |
Wang, Zongan; Jumper, John M; Wang, Sheng et al. (2018) A Membrane Burial Potential with H-Bonds and Applications to Curved Membranes and Fast Simulations. Biophys J 115:1872-1884 |
Infield, Daniel T; Matulef, Kimberly; Galpin, Jason D et al. (2018) Main-chain mutagenesis reveals intrahelical coupling in an ion channel voltage-sensor. Nat Commun 9:5055 |
Martens, Chloe; Shekhar, Mrinal; Borysik, Antoni J et al. (2018) Direct protein-lipid interactions shape the conformational landscape of secondary transporters. Nat Commun 9:4151 |
Vermaas, Josh V; Rempe, Susan B; Tajkhorshid, Emad (2018) Electrostatic lock in the transport cycle of the multidrug resistance transporter EmrE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E7502-E7511 |
Bailey, Lucas J; Sheehy, Kimberly M; Dominik, Pawel K et al. (2018) Locking the Elbow: Improved Antibody Fab Fragments as Chaperones for Structure Determination. J Mol Biol 430:337-347 |
Huang, Shengdian; Zhang, Hui; Paletta, Joseph T et al. (2018) Reduction kinetics and electrochemistry of tetracarboxylate nitroxides. Free Radic Res 52:327-334 |
Abramyan, Ara M; Quick, Matthias; Xue, Catherine et al. (2018) Exploring Substrate Binding in the Extracellular Vestibule of MhsT by Atomistic Simulations and Markov Models. J Chem Inf Model 58:1244-1252 |
Showing the most recent 10 out of 282 publications