It has been known for some time that corrected anisometropes who wear spectacle lenses of different power in front of the two eyes are able to generate saccades that differ in amplitude in the two eyes exactly as required by the differing magnifications of the spectacle lenses. A common assumption is that this ability results from the operation of a neural adaptive mechanism, which, over time, gradually adjusts the relative amplitudes of the saccades produced by the two eyes. We now report that when the scenes viewed by the two eyes suddenly differ in size, the two eyes produce saccades that immediately differ in amplitude without any prior period of adaptation. Two slide projectors and an arrangement of orthogonal polarizing filters were used to present overlapping stationary random dot patterns simultaneously yet separately to the two eyes. The right eye always saw the same pattern while the left eye saw a pattern that was initially identical (pretest) and later replaced by one that was 8% smaller (test). The positions of both sides were recorded with the electromagnetic search coil, and horizontal saccades were elicited by target spots projected onto the pattern through polarizing filters so as to be visible only to the right eye. Subjects were three humans and three rhesus monkeys. Immediately upon viewing the smaller pattern, the left eye produced horizontal saccades that were significantly smaller than those produced by the right eye. This indicates that the saccadic system has some ability to cope immediately with aniseikonia, the compensation being almost complete in some subjects. We suggest that the important cue in these experiments is horizontal disparity and that the saccadic system uses this to scale the relative amplitudes of the saccades produced by the two eyes.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Type
Intramural Research (Z01)
Project #
1Z01EY000153-11
Application #
3777618
Study Section
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
11
Fiscal Year
1993
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
U.S. National Eye Institute
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
United States
Zip Code
Kodaka, Y; Sheliga, B M; FitzGibbon, E J et al. (2007) The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors. Vision Res 47:2637-60
Sheliga, B M; FitzGibbon, E J; Miles, F A (2007) Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism. Vision Res 47:479-500
Takemura, Aya; Murata, Yumi; Kawano, Kenji et al. (2007) Deficits in short-latency tracking eye movements after chemical lesions in monkey cortical areas MT and MST. J Neurosci 27:529-41
Rucker, Janet C; Sheliga, Boris M; Fitzgibbon, Edmond J et al. (2006) Contrast sensitivity, first-order motion and Initial ocular following in demyelinating optic neuropathy. J Neurol 253:1203-9
Sheliga, B M; Chen, K J; FitzGibbon, E J et al. (2006) The initial ocular following responses elicited by apparent-motion stimuli: reversal by inter-stimulus intervals. Vision Res 46:979-92
Miura, Kenichiro; Matsuura, Kiyoto; Taki, Masakatsu et al. (2006) The visual motion detectors underlying ocular following responses in monkeys. Vision Res 46:869-78
Sheliga, B M; Kodaka, Y; FitzGibbon, E J et al. (2006) Human ocular following initiated by competing image motions: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism. Vision Res 46:2041-60
Sheliga, B M; FitzGibbon, E J; Miles, F A (2006) Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy. Vision Res 46:3723-40
Sheliga, B M; Chen, K J; Fitzgibbon, E J et al. (2005) Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy. Vision Res 45:3307-21
Sheliga, B M; Chen, K J; Fitzgibbon, E J et al. (2005) Short-latency disparity vergence in humans: evidence for early spatial filtering. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1039:252-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 22 publications