We examined the velocity dependence of the vergence and version eye movements elicited by motion stimuli that were symmetric or asymmetric at the two eyes. Movements of both eyes were recorded with the scleral search coil technique. Vergence was computed as the difference in the positions of the two eyes (left - right) and version was computed as the average position of the two eyes ((left+right)/2). Subjects faced a large tangent screen onto which two identical random-dot patterns were back-projected. Each pattern was viewed by one eye only using crossed-polarizers and its position was controlled by X/Y mirror galvanometers. Viewing was always binocular, and horizontal velocity steps (range, 5 to 240?/s) were applied to one (asymmetric stimulus) or both (symmetric stimulus) patterns 50ms after a centering saccade. With the symmetric stimulus, the motion at the two eyes could be either in the opposite direction (eliciting vergence responses) or in the same direction (eliciting version responses). The asymmetric stimuli elicited both vergence and version. In all cases, minimum response latencies were very short (less than 90 ms). Velocity tuning curves (based on the changes in vergence and version over the time period, 90-140 ms) were all sigmoidal and peaked when the monocular (i.e., retinal) image velocities were 30-60?/s. The vergence (version) responses to symmetric stimuli were linearly related to the vergence (version) responses to asymmetric stimuli when expressed in terms of the monocular rather than the binocular image velocities. We conclude that the dynamical limits for both vergence and version are imposed in the monocular visual pathways, before the inputs from the two eyes are combined.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Type
Intramural Research (Z01)
Project #
1Z01EY000153-19
Application #
6672715
Study Section
(LSR)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
19
Fiscal Year
2002
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
U.S. National Eye Institute
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
United States
Zip Code
Kodaka, Y; Sheliga, B M; FitzGibbon, E J et al. (2007) The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors. Vision Res 47:2637-60
Sheliga, B M; FitzGibbon, E J; Miles, F A (2007) Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism. Vision Res 47:479-500
Takemura, Aya; Murata, Yumi; Kawano, Kenji et al. (2007) Deficits in short-latency tracking eye movements after chemical lesions in monkey cortical areas MT and MST. J Neurosci 27:529-41
Rucker, Janet C; Sheliga, Boris M; Fitzgibbon, Edmond J et al. (2006) Contrast sensitivity, first-order motion and Initial ocular following in demyelinating optic neuropathy. J Neurol 253:1203-9
Sheliga, B M; Chen, K J; FitzGibbon, E J et al. (2006) The initial ocular following responses elicited by apparent-motion stimuli: reversal by inter-stimulus intervals. Vision Res 46:979-92
Miura, Kenichiro; Matsuura, Kiyoto; Taki, Masakatsu et al. (2006) The visual motion detectors underlying ocular following responses in monkeys. Vision Res 46:869-78
Sheliga, B M; Kodaka, Y; FitzGibbon, E J et al. (2006) Human ocular following initiated by competing image motions: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism. Vision Res 46:2041-60
Sheliga, B M; FitzGibbon, E J; Miles, F A (2006) Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy. Vision Res 46:3723-40
Sheliga, B M; Chen, K J; Fitzgibbon, E J et al. (2005) Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy. Vision Res 45:3307-21
Sheliga, B M; Chen, K J; Fitzgibbon, E J et al. (2005) Short-latency disparity vergence in humans: evidence for early spatial filtering. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1039:252-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 22 publications