The present research plan aims efforts to understand between situational and personality variables affecting the person's need for cognitive closure and majors aspect of group interaction. We already know that several situational variables (time pressure, noise, fatigue, boredom) induce a need for closure, and that this need is reduced by a sense of accountability or the desirability of accurate judgments. We also know that the need for closure represent an enduring dimension of individual differences. We also know that the need for closure affect the way the individual processes information and forms opinions on a variety of topics. The present research sets out to investigate the effects need for closure may have on group interaction. A general thesis to be investigated is whether need for closure may not promote the evolution of a conservative attitude among the group members. More specifically, the following issues of interest will be investigated: I. Whether group members' need for closure induces the preference for authoritarian leadership and non-participative decision-making rules. II. Whether group members' need for closure leads to status-allocation on basis of diffuse social characteristics (e.g. gender). III. Whether group members' need for closure induces a resistance to change (represented e.g. by membership-shifts and variation in group- tasks). IV. Whether group members' need for closure affects intra-group relations, in particular those between a minority and the majority. V. Whether group members' need for closure leads to more positive attitude toward ingroup members and a greater differentiation between them and outgroup members. All the above issues bear on major ways in which individuals function in groups. Understanding those matters may have important health consequences both in terms of improving individuals' adjustment to groups, their ability to optimally function in groups and the ability of groups to optimally contribute to individuals' welfare. Altogether fifteen studies are proposed designed to allow convergent validation of the central theoretical notions through multiple operationalizations of the need for closure.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Scientist Award (K05)
Project #
5K05MH001213-04
Application #
2674404
Study Section
Social and Group Processes Review Committee (SGP)
Project Start
1995-06-01
Project End
2000-05-31
Budget Start
1998-06-01
Budget End
1999-05-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Maryland College Park
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
City
College Park
State
MD
Country
United States
Zip Code
20742
Pierro, Antonio; Mannetti, Lucia; De Grada, Eraldo et al. (2003) Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:405-17
Jost, John T; Glaser, Jack; Kruglanski, Arie W et al. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull 129:339-75
Kruglanski, Arie W; Shah, James Y; Pierro, Antonio et al. (2002) When similarity breeds content: need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:648-62
Chun, Woo Young; Spiegel, Scott; Kruglanski, Arie W (2002) Assimilative behavior identification can also be resource dependent: the unimodel perspective on personal-attribution phases. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:542-55
Kruglanski, A W; Thompson, E P; Higgins, E T et al. (2000) To ""do the right thing"" or to ""just do it"": locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. J Pers Soc Psychol 79:793-815
Shah, J Y; Kruglanski, A W; Thompson, E P (1998) Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: need for closure effects on in-group bias. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:383-93
Rubini, M; Kruglanski, A W (1997) Brief encounters ending in estrangement: motivated language use and interpersonal rapport in the question-answer paradigm. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:1047-60
Kruglanski, A W; Atash, M N; DeGrada, E et al. (1997) Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the need for closure scale. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:1005-16; discussion 1017-29
Webster, D M; Kruglanski, A W; Pattison, D A (1997) Motivated language use in intergroup contexts: need-for-closure effects on the linguistic intergroup bias. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:1122-31
Kruglanski, A W; Webster, D M (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: ""seizing"" and ""freezing"". Psychol Rev 103:263-83