A major impulse for the study of subjective well-being has been the question how policy affects the distribution of subjective well-being within a country. A natural approach to learning about policy effects is to compare policies across countries and relate these to observed differences in well-being. Most of the work on international comparisons of well-being has been based on global satisfaction measures, like single questions inviting respondents to rate their happiness on a numerical or verbal scale. This work has often produced conflicting findings. More recently, experienced well-being has been proposed as an alternative measure. Both approaches to the measurement of well-being are in principle vulnerable to Differential Item Functioning, particularly when used to compare different countries. We essentially propose providing a laboratory for the development of subjective well-being measures and procedures for making them internationally comparable. This includes a thorough analysis of the properties of the different well-being measures and in particular how anchoring vignettes can be used to improve the comparability of well-being measures across population groups and across countries. To that end we will conduct several experiments in two population representative Internet panels: the American Life Panel (ALP) in the U.S. and the LISS panel in The Netheriands.
There is ample evidence that well-being is related to health outcomes, while subjective well-being is also an important outcome in its own right. A better understanding of how to measure subjective well-being and how alternative measures may lead to different conclusions will aid policy decision making.
|Golinowska, StanisÅ‚awa; Sowa, Agnieszka; Deeg, Dorly et al. (2016) Participation in formal learning activities of older Europeans in poor and good health. Eur J Ageing 13:115-127|
|Vignoli, Daniele; Tanturri, Maria Letizia; Acciai, Francesco (2016) Home bitter home? Gender, living arrangements, and the exclusion from homeownership among older Europeans. Genus 72:9|
|Bordone, Valeria; de Valk, Helga A G (2016) Intergenerational support among migrant families in Europe. Eur J Ageing 13:259-270|
|GBD 2015 DALYs and HALE Collaborators (2016) Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388:1603-1658|
|Palladino, Raffaele; Tayu Lee, John; Ashworth, Mark et al. (2016) Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 European countries. Age Ageing 45:431-5|
|Sowa, Agnieszka; Golinowska, StanisÅ‚awa; Deeg, Dorly et al. (2016) Predictors of religious participation of older Europeans in good and poor health. Eur J Ageing 13:145-157|
|Rappange, David R; Brouwer, Werner B F; van Exel, Job (2016) Rational expectations? An explorative study of subjective survival probabilities and lifestyle across Europe. Health Expect 19:121-37|
|Litwin, Howard; Stoeckel, Kimberly J (2016) Social Network, Activity Participation, and Cognition: A Complex Relationship. Res Aging 38:76-97|
|Wahrendorf, Morten; Blane, David; Matthews, Katey et al. (2016) Linking Quality of Work in Midlife to Volunteering During Retirement: a European Study. J Popul Ageing 9:113-130|
|Figueiredo, Daniela; Teixeira, Laetitia; Poveda, Veronica et al. (2016) Predictors of Difficulty in Medication Intake in Europe: a Cross-country Analysis Based on SHARE. Aging Dis 7:246-53|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 224 publications