Biomarkers of asbestos exposure: All forms of asbestos including the amphiboles (crocidolite, amosite, tremolite, actinolite, and anthophyllite) as well as the serpentine form chrysotile, cause mesothelioma and cancer of the lung. Therefore, it would be highly desirable to have available sensitive and specific biomarkers of asbestos exposure in order to assess potential inter-individual risks of developing mesothelioma or lung cancer. In on-going studies, we are developing serum metabolomic markers of exposure to asbestos. This has involved the implementation of nanospray ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) in combination with high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Individual samples are extracted with a suitable solvent (Folch extraction) then aqueous and organic phases are subjected to analysis by high resolution nanospray UPLC-MS. Individual chromatograms are aligned using a combination of open-source and proprietary software. Chromatograms from control samples are then interrogated against experimental samples for differences in intensity of each MS signal. Identification of metabolites is conducted by using different modes of MS/MS analysis. These studies have resulted in the generation of a rich data-set of biomarkers, in which a number of metabolites are dysregulated in asbestos exposure when compared with control non-exposed individuals. Therefore, we are poised to develop a robust biomarker panels for both asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. We will test the hypotheses that: 1) Asbestos exposure will increase oxidative stress as revealed by current serum oxidative stress biomarkers. (2) Metabolomics analysis of serum using ultra-high resolution LC-MS will reveal novel biomarkers of asbestos exposure and mesothelioma that can be characterized using modern bioanalytical techniques. (3) Profiling of human serum proteins will identify signatures of asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. These hypotheses will be tested under the following three Specific Aims.
Aim 1 : To quantify biomarkers of oxidative stress and identify and quantify differentially secreted metabolites in the serum of human subjects exposed to asbestos, serum from subjects with mesothelioma, and control serum from normal unexposed control subjects.
Aim 2 : To quantify biomarkers of oxidative stress and identify and quantify differentially secreted metabolites in asbestos-exposed immortalized mouse cells and serum provided by Project 4 from mice genetically engineered to develop mesothelioma compared with isogenic non-exposed mice.
Aim 3 : To analyze serum HMGB1 and profile serum proteins (SOMAmer assay) in asbestos-exposed and unexposed individuals to identify asbestos exposure biomarkers and to analyze serum fibulin-3 as a mesothelioma biomarker to complement serum metabolomic biomarkers obtained in Aim 1. Successful completion of these studies of asbestos exposure would have a significant translational impact for risk assessment and management within the local community. It would have an immediate impact on risk communication and risk management that would be rapidly translated to other members of the SRP through the regular research meetings. It would also impact on regulators of risk assessment and risk management. Another translational impact would be the use of biomarkers for monitoring disease prevention and treatment as well as the identification of individuals at risk for follow-up studies. It will be possible to identify particular individuals who have been exposed to asbestos and have a high risk profile for careful clinical monitoring or asbestos-exposed individuals lacking a high risk profile.
All forms of asbestos including the amphiboles as well as the serpentine form chrysotile, cause mesothelioma and cancer of the lung. We are developing sensitive and specific rum biomarkers of asbestos exposure in order to assess potential inter-individual risks of developing mesothelioma or lung cancer. The new biomarker panel will make it possible to identify particular individuals who have been exposed to asbestos and have a high risk profile for careful clinical monitoring or asbestos-exposed individuals lacking a high risk profile.
|Huang, Jing; Liu, Yulun; Vitale, Steve et al. (2017) On meta- and mega-analyses for gene-environment interactions. Genet Epidemiol 41:876-886|
|Dietterich, Lee H; Gonneau, Cédric; Casper, Brenda B (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization has little consequence for plant heavy metal uptake in contaminated field soils. Ecol Appl 27:1862-1875|
|Cheung, Mitchell; Testa, Joseph R (2017) BAP1, a tumor suppressor gene driving malignant mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 6:270-278|
|Mesaros, Clementina; Arroyo, Alejandro D; Blair, Ian A et al. (2017) Coenzyme A thioester formation of 11- and 15-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 130:1-7|
|Patel, Chirag J; Kerr, Jacqueline; Thomas, Duncan C et al. (2017) Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental Exposure Assessment in Population-Based Studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26:1370-1380|
|Gonneau, Cédric; Mohanty, Sanjay K; Dietterich, Lee H et al. (2017) Differential elemental uptake in three pseudo-metallophyte C4 grasses in situ in the eastern USA. Plant Soil 416:149-163|
|Velalopoulou, Anastasia; Chatterjee, Shampa; Pietrofesa, Ralph A et al. (2017) Synthetic Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside (LGM2605) Protects Human Lung in an Ex Vivo Model of Proton Radiation Damage. Int J Mol Sci 18:|
|Gonneau, Cédric; Miller, Kinsey; Mohanty, Sanjay K et al. (2017) Framework for assessment and phytoremediation of asbestos-contaminated sites. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:25912-25922|
|Wu, Lei; Ortiz, Carlos P; Jerolmack, Douglas J (2017) Aggregation of Elongated Colloids in Water. Langmuir 33:622-629|
|Xu, Rengyi; Mesaros, Clementina; Weng, Liwei et al. (2017) Comparison of statistical methods for detection of serum lipid biomarkers for mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Biomark Med 11:547-556|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 32 publications