The objectives of Project 1 (Classification and Integration) are to (a) continue research evaluating classification and measurement issues that affect the identification of children as learning disabled (LD), with a focus on response to instruction (RTI) models;and (b) expand use of meta-analytic methods to integrate research across domains of LD, including reading comprehension and executive functions.
Specific Aim 1 (Classification and Identification) addresses the nature and reliability of different methods for identifying children with LD based on simulated data and actual data from Projects 2-4. Simulations include (a) estimation of expected agreement when classification is made with multiple unreliable variables and various cut points;(b) identification of inadequate responders using different methods and cut points as well as other subgroups, such as so-called gifted LD or twice exceptional children;and (c) estimation of efficiency and utility in relation to different base rates and number of assessments. Similar comparisons will be made using actual data on intervention response from Project 3 (Intervention).
Specific Aim 2 (External Validity of RTI Models) addresses the validity of the intervention response criteria evaluated under Aim 1. Using data collected under Projects 2 and 4, we will compare adequate and inadequate responders from Project 3 (Intervention) on cognitive assessments of executive functions and other domains. We will work with Project 4 (Neuroimaging) to compare adequate and inadequate responders on structural and functional neuroimaging measures. In addition, intervention response criteria will be compared to criteria generated by other proposed classifications, including IQ-discrepancy, low achievement, and cognitive strengths and weaknesses models.
Specific Aim 3 (Integration) continues and expands our work on empirical synthesis from the previous five years. We propose to continue meta-analytic work addressing (a) predictors of intervention response;(b) executive functions in relation to different academic domains, especially reading comprehension and written expression;and (c) expand previous meta-analyses of intervention outcomes.
Identifying individual children who meet criteria for LD has plagued research and practice. This proposal leverages advances in statistical computing and analytic models, simulation, and meta-analysis to continue and extend a long history of research on the classification and definition of LD, evaluating the reliability of different approaches to identification, the validity of classifications based on intervention response, and integration of research on classification, executive functions and intervention.
|Huang, Jin; Vaughn, Michael G; Kremer, Kristen P (2016) Breastfeeding and child development outcomes: an investigation of the nurturing hypothesis. Matern Child Nutr 12:757-67|
|Williams, Kelly J; Walker, Melodee A; Vaughn, Sharon et al. (2016) A Synthesis of Reading and Spelling Interventions and Their Effects on Spelling Outcomes for Students With Learning Disabilities. J Learn Disabil :|
|Cirino, Paul T; Miciak, Jeremy; Gerst, Elyssa et al. (2016) Executive Function, Self-Regulated Learning, and Reading Comprehension: A Training Study. J Learn Disabil :|
|Hodge, David R; Salas-Wright, Christopher P; Vaughn, Michael G (2016) Behavioral Risk Profiles of Homeschooled Adolescents in the United States: A Nationally Representative Examination of Substance Use Related Outcomes. Subst Use Misuse :1-13|
|Dimitriadis, Stavros I; Laskaris, Nikolaos A; Simos, Panagiotis G et al. (2016) Greater Repertoire and Temporal Variability of Cross-Frequency Coupling (CFC) Modes in Resting-State Neuromagnetic Recordings among Children with Reading Difficulties. Front Hum Neurosci 10:163|
|Fletcher, Jack M; Miciak, Jeremy (2016) Comprehensive Cognitive Assessments are not Necessary for the Identification and Treatment of Learning Disabilities. Arch Clin Neuropsychol :|
|Huang, Jin; Vaughn, Michael G (2016) Household Food Insecurity and Children's Behaviour Problems: New Evidence from a Trajectories-Based Study. Br J Soc Work 46:993-1008|
|Taylor, W Pat; Miciak, Jeremy; Fletcher, Jack M et al. (2016) Cognitive Discrepancy Models for Specific Learning Disabilities Identification: Simulations of Psychometric Limitations. Psychol Assess :|
|Wanzek, Jeanne; Vaughn, Sharon; Scammacca, Nancy et al. (2016) Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3. Educ Psychol Rev 28:551-576|
|Barnes, Marcia A; Stuebing, Karla; Fletcher, Jack M et al. (2016) Cognitive Difficulties in Struggling Comprehenders and their Relation to Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Group Selection and Regression-Based Models. J Res Educ Eff 9:153-172|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 106 publications