Medicare spending on post acute care has exploded in the past decade, catalyzing intense policy interest in strategies to reduce post acute expenditures without harming health or increasing the offsetting costs of other health services. Under the traditional Medicare benefit design, the first 20 days of skilled nursing facility care ad all episodes of home care are provided free (i.e. without a copayment), raising concerns about patients'incentives to overuse these services, even when they are of little or no value. To address this concern President Obama, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, and the Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction committee have all expressed support for the imposition of a copayment for the use of post acute care. Yet, there is no empirical evidence base to predict the impact of such policies. The objective of this proposal is to evaluate the impact of changes in cost-sharing on the use and outcomes of post acute care using a quasi- experimental research design and a national sample of Medicare enrollees in managed care plans. The central hypotheses of the proposed research, which is based on the results of an extensive series of preliminary studies, are that copayments will sharply reduce the use of post acute care, induce shifts to other post acute services with lower out-of-pocket costs, drive hospitalized beneficiarie out of managed care plans into the fee- for-service system, and increase hospital length of stay and the probability of readmission. Our expectations are that this project will provide rigorous estimates of the response of Medicare beneficiaries to post acute copayments and contribute significantly to our understanding of the effect of cost-sharing among the elderly, who were excluded from the landmark RAND Health Insurance Experiment conducted in the 1970's. Finally, this research can inform optimal Medicare benefit policies that promote better health outcomes and the appropriate use of post acute services while minimizing negative unintended consequences for frail elderly and the Medicare program budget.
Policymakers are considering imposing copayments for Medicare beneficiaries to use skilled nursing facilities and home health care, but there is no evidence about the impact of requiring out-of-pocket payments for such services. The objective of this project is to examine the effect of changes in copayments for post acute care among elderly enrollees in Medicare managed care plans.
|Keohane, Laura M; Grebla, Regina C; Rahman, Momotazur et al. (2017) First-dollar cost-sharing for skilled nursing facility care in medicare advantage plans. BMC Health Serv Res 17:611|
|Li, Qijuan; Keohane, Laura M; Thomas, Kali et al. (2017) Association of Cost Sharing With Use of Home Health Services Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees. JAMA Intern Med 177:1012-1018|
|Baier, Rosa R; Trivedi, Amal N (2016) For Hospital Readmissions, Hindsight is Not 20/20. J Gen Intern Med 31:1270-1271|
|Trivedi, Amal N (2016) Understanding Seniors' Choices in Medicare Advantage. J Gen Intern Med 31:151-2|
|Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz; Leyva, Bryan; Keohane, Laura M et al. (2016) Quality of Care for White and Hispanic Medicare Advantage Enrollees in the United States and Puerto Rico. JAMA Intern Med 176:787-94|
|Keohane, Laura M; Grebla, Regina C; Mor, Vincent et al. (2015) Medicare Advantage Members' Expected Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Inpatient And Skilled Nursing Facility Services. Health Aff (Millwood) 34:1019-27|
|Grebla, Regina C; Keohane, Laura; Lee, Yoojin et al. (2015) Waiving the three-day rule: admissions and length-of-stay at hospitals and skilled nursing facilities did not increase. Health Aff (Millwood) 34:1324-30|
|Rahman, Momotazur; Keohane, Laura; Trivedi, Amal N et al. (2015) High-Cost Patients Had Substantial Rates Of Leaving Medicare Advantage And Joining Traditional Medicare. Health Aff (Millwood) 34:1675-81|