I have trained as an electrical engineer and as a systems neurobiologist. Over the past ten years I have investigated how motor cortices guide arm movements and how this neural activity can be used to control prosthetic arms and computer cursors. I now recognize that a major new research direction is imperative if we are to truly understand the neural control of movement in the """"""""real-world"""""""" and design neural prostheses for large numbers of people. The fundamental assumption which I call into question, and aim to address, is that cortical-motor activity is the same across behavioral contexts, contexts as different as sitting quietly in a dark room without moving ones eyes or head (conventional experimental setting) and actively moving around in a large space with lights, sounds and body posture constantly varying (the proposed """"""""real world"""""""" setting). We must begin conducting electrophysiological experiments in monkeys able to freely move around in large spaces, which will serve as an animal model for freely moving humans. This is a dramatically new and different direction, which is only now plausible due to tremendous advances in microelectronics technology and the major new technological and experimental paradigms proposed here. I proposed to build a new suite of recording, wireless telemetery and behavioral monitoring technology to enable this new brand of basic and applied neuroscience investigation. We will also conduct a definitive set of neurophysiological and neural prosthetic experiments, to highlight the power and broad applicability of this new paradigm in addition to documenting initial, and likely highly surprising, discoveries. If successful, I anticipate this new experimental paradigm and results to greatly change basic neuroscience investigations of motor control, applied neuroscience/neuroengineering aimed at designing robust and high-performance neural prostheses, and large patient populations whose quality of life will be dramatically improved

National Institute of Health (NIH)
Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health (OD)
NIH Director’s Pioneer Award (NDPA) (DP1)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZGM1-NDPA-B (02))
Program Officer
Jones, Warren
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Stanford University
Engineering (All Types)
Schools of Engineering
United States
Zip Code
O'Shea, Daniel J; Shenoy, Krishna V (2018) ERAASR: an algorithm for removing electrical stimulation artifacts from multielectrode array recordings. J Neural Eng 15:026020
O'Shea, Daniel J; Kalanithi, Paul; Ferenczi, Emily A et al. (2018) Development of an optogenetic toolkit for neural circuit dissection in squirrel monkeys. Sci Rep 8:6775
Kaufman, Matthew T; Seely, Jeffrey S; Sussillo, David et al. (2016) The Largest Response Component in the Motor Cortex Reflects Movement Timing but Not Movement Type. eNeuro 3:
Nuyujukian, Paul; Fan, Joline M; Kao, Jonathan C et al. (2015) A high-performance keyboard neural prosthesis enabled by task optimization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62:21-29
Fan, Joline M; Nuyujukian, Paul; Kao, Jonathan C et al. (2014) Intention estimation in brain-machine interfaces. J Neural Eng 11:016004
Shenoy, Krishna V; Carmena, Jose M (2014) Combining decoder design and neural adaptation in brain-machine interfaces. Neuron 84:665-80
Bishop, William; Chestek, Cynthia C; Gilja, Vikash et al. (2014) Self-recalibrating classifiers for intracortical brain-computer interfaces. J Neural Eng 11:026001
Sussillo, David (2014) Neural circuits as computational dynamical systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 25:156-63
Kaufman, Matthew T; Churchland, Mark M; Ryu, Stephen I et al. (2014) Cortical activity in the null space: permitting preparation without movement. Nat Neurosci 17:440-8
Ames, K Cora; Ryu, Stephen I; Shenoy, Krishna V (2014) Neural dynamics of reaching following incorrect or absent motor preparation. Neuron 81:438-51

Showing the most recent 10 out of 37 publications