Attention seems to play an important role in the ability of a listener to extract information from a complex environment. The first hypothesis to be tested is that auditory tasks performed in a complex environment require more attentional resources than in a simple environment. This will be tested by measuring the ability of listeners to perform one or more tasks in the presence of interfering sounds. By using the dual-task methodology, the costs of dividing attention between tasks will be quantified. The second hypothesis is that hearing impaired listeners must devote more attentional resources to equivalent auditory tasks - simple or complex - than must normal hearing listeners. A number of researchers have concluded, based on their research, that listeners with sensory-neural hearing loss have deficits that go beyond degraded sensory representations. If a normal hearing listener can perform a particular task with a given amount of attentional resources, it is possible that the amount of resources required for impaired listeners to do the same task is greater, in an amount correlated with the degree of hearing loss. By again employing the dual-task, the attentional resources used by hearing-impaired listeners will be compared with those used by normal-hearing listeners in the same tasks.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Type
Postdoctoral Individual National Research Service Award (F32)
Project #
5F32DC006526-03
Application #
7000340
Study Section
Communication Disorders Review Committee (CDRC)
Program Officer
Sklare, Dan
Project Start
2004-01-09
Project End
2006-10-31
Budget Start
2006-01-09
Budget End
2006-10-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$41,825
Indirect Cost
Name
Boston University
Department
Other Health Professions
Type
Schools of Allied Health Profes
DUNS #
049435266
City
Boston
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02215
Best, Virginia; Gallun, Frederick J; Mason, Christine R et al. (2010) The impact of noise and hearing loss on the processing of simultaneous sentences. Ear Hear 31:213-20
Dent, Micheal L; McClaine, Elizabeth M; Best, Virginia et al. (2009) Spatial unmasking of birdsong in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Comp Psychol 123:357-67
Kidd Jr, Gerald; Richards, Virginia M; Mason, Christine R et al. (2008) Informational masking increases the costs of monitoring multiple channels. J Acoust Soc Am 124:EL223-9
Gallun, Frederick J; Durlach, Nathaniel I; Colburn, H Steven et al. (2008) The extent to which a position-based explanation accounts for binaural release from informational masking. J Acoust Soc Am 124:439-49
Best, Virginia; Gallun, Frederick J; Carlile, Simon et al. (2007) Binaural interference and auditory grouping. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1070-6
Gallun, Frederick J; Mason, Christine R; Kidd Jr, Gerald (2007) The ability to listen with independent ears. J Acoust Soc Am 122:2814-25
Gallun, Frederick J; Mason, Christine R; Kidd Jr, Gerald (2007) Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli. Percept Psychophys 69:757-71
Durlach, Nathaniel I; Gallun, Frederick J (2007) Theory construction in auditory perception: need for development of teaching materials. J Acoust Soc Am 122:1014-6
Best, Virginia; Gallun, Frederick J; Ihlefeld, Antje et al. (2006) The influence of spatial separation on divided listening. J Acoust Soc Am 120:1506-16
Kidd Jr, Gerald; Arbogast, Tanya L; Mason, Christine R et al. (2005) The advantage of knowing where to listen. J Acoust Soc Am 118:3804-15

Showing the most recent 10 out of 13 publications