Background: This is a renewal application for the RR&D funded Merit Review titled, Home Study of an Advanced Upper Limb Prosthesis (Home Study). The DEKA Arm is designed to use inertial measurement units (IMUs) worn on the feet in combination with traditional EMG controls and switches, as needed to control multiple degrees of freedom. To date, one or more IMUs were required to operate the device. There is substantial cognitive load required for the complex task of pre-planning and sequentially controlling multiple joints/actuators using this control method. Recent commercial release of an EMG pattern recognition system holds promise for decreasing cognitive burden by eliminating the IMUs. Substituting foot control with more intuitive pattern recognition control may lead to greater acceptance of and better function with the DEKA Arm. Purpose: The overall objective is to examine the feasibility, acceptance and benefits of home use of the DEKA Arm, as well as the logistical support requirements utilized during 3 months of home usage. Specifically we aim to: 1) Identify and describe upper limb amputees who would be appropriate candidates for home use of this advanced prosthesis as well as those who would not be appropriate; 2) Compare the extent of use of the existing prosthesis to that of the DEKA Arm and quantify the impact of home use of the DEKA Arm on device satisfaction, performance of functional activities and the user's quality of life; 3) Compare the outcomes of users of pattern recognition to the outcomes of users without; and 4) Quantify the amount and type of technical support and repairs needed during the study, and estimate the number of home study days lost due to service/repair. Methods: Design. The study uses a quasi-experimental, time series design. This study has 2 parts: Part A involves in-laboratory training and supervised community outings using the DEKA Arm; Part B involves a 3 month trial of home use. Sample. This renewal will recruit up to 12 additional subjects with transradial or transhumeral amputation. Procedures. Part A subjects will maintain daily logs of prosthesis use prior to training. Subjects will be fit with a prosthetic socket, have EMG pattern recognition controls configured, and then be trained to use the DEKA Arm. After training, the study staff will classify each participant as appropriate or not appropriate for home usage. For Part B, we will gather data on home safety, prosthetic use and technical support required during the home trial. We will use standardized outcome measures collected in Part A and B to examine outcomes of pain, dexterity, functional activities, prosthetic satisfaction and quality of life and collect qualitative data from home safety assessments, video logs, surveys, interviews and prosthetic usage journals. Data Analysis. We will calculate the percentage of subjects who participate in Part A of the study who are determined to have met the preliminary criteria for home use appropriateness. We will describe subjects in each group and examine characteristics of those subjects who were not considered appropriate candidates for home use to identify which, if any factors were predictive. Measures of existing prosthetic activity will be compared with those of home use of the DEKA Arm to determine the extent of adoption. We will examine changes in device satisfaction, performance of functional activities and quality of life throughout the study using within subject pre and post intervention measures. We will summarize descriptive data on technical support usage. We will compare outcomes for subjects using pattern recognition control to outcomes for subjects at similar configuration levels who did not use pattern recognition using nonparametric Wilcoxon- Mann-Whitney tests. Importance: Results will inform the adoption of pattern recognition controls and help to move the DEKA Arm closer to successful deployment. Results will provide important information to help determine which amputees are appropriate candidates for the DEKA Arm, as well as provide data on usefulness and acceptability in a home environment. Findings will help inform the development of clinical guidelines for prescription of advanced upper limb prosthetic technology and controls.

Public Health Relevance

The US Government invested millions of dollars to develop the DEKA Arm, advanced upper limb prosthesis. In 2012, the VA funded the Home Study of an Advanced Upper Limb Prosthesis. The purpose of this study is to determine device usefulness and acceptability in the home environment. The FDA approved commercial marketing of the DEKA Arm in 2014, and efforts are underway to make it available for clinical use. Recent commercial release of an EMG pattern recognition system may provide an alternative to DEKA's foot controls. More intuitive pattern recognition control may lead to greater acceptance of and better function of the DEKA Arm. This renewal application extends ongoing work by comparing outcomes of subjects using pattern recognition to those not using this control scheme. Results will inform dissemination and deployment of the DEKA Arm and be used to develop clinical guidelines for prescription.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Veterans Affairs (VA)
Type
Non-HHS Research Projects (I01)
Project #
2I01RX000771-05
Application #
9083490
Study Section
Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic Rehabilitation (RRD2)
Project Start
2012-07-01
Project End
2018-06-30
Budget Start
2016-07-01
Budget End
2017-06-30
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2016
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Providence VA Medical Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
182465745
City
Providence
State
RI
Country
United States
Zip Code
Resnik, Linda; Acluche, Frantzy; Borgia, Matthew (2018) The DEKA hand: A multifunction prosthetic terminal device-patterns of grip usage at home. Prosthet Orthot Int 42:446-454
Resnik, Linda; Borgia, Matthew; Acluche, Frantzy (2018) Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA. Prosthet Orthot Int 42:75-83
Resnik, Linda; Acluche, Frantzy; Lieberman Klinger, Shana et al. (2018) Does the DEKA Arm substitute for or supplement conventional prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 42:534-543
Resnik, Linda J; Borgia, Matthew L; Acluche, Frantzy et al. (2018) How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses? PLoS One 13:e0191326
Resnik, Linda; Cancio, Jill; Klinger, Shana et al. (2018) Predictors of retention and attrition in a study of an advanced upper limb prosthesis: implications for adoption of the DEKA Arm. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 13:206-210
Cowley, Jeffrey; Resnik, Linda; Wilken, Jason et al. (2017) Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks. Prosthet Orthot Int 41:33-40
Resnik, Linda J; Borgia, Matthew L; Acluche, Frantzy (2017) Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA Arm before and after a trial of home use. PLoS One 12:e0178640
Resnik, Linda; Fantini, Christopher; Latlief, Gail et al. (2017) Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series. PLoS One 12:e0178642
Resnik, Linda; Borgia, Mathew; Acluche, Frantzy (2017) Timed activity performance in persons with upper limb amputation: A preliminary study. J Hand Ther 30:468-476
Resnik, Linda; Klinger, Shana (2017) Attrition and retention in upper limb prosthetics research: experience of the VA home study of the DEKA arm. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 12:816-821

Showing the most recent 10 out of 11 publications