It is well established that social context impacts physical and mental health. People with more social connections experience less illness and recover more quickly and thoroughly when they do. Understanding the mechanism by which social context influences wellbeing will allow for the development of new interventions and treatments for pathology, and in particular psychopathy. Despite accumulating evidence that illustrates a relationship between social relationships and wellbeing, little is known about the biological mechanisms that subserve that relationship. One possible mechanism is that social context influences brain anatomy which in turn influences wellbeing. New evidence collected in people and monkeys illustrates that the more social relationships an individual has, the larger the volume of the amygdala and other brain regions critically important for the generation and regulation of emotions. These data point to a relationship between social network size and the structure and function of brain areas that are important for emotion and wellbeing, although they leave a number of important questions unanswered. First, is it only social network size that matters, or does an individual?s social role impact neuroanatomy? Second, how does an individual?s social role early in development influence neuroanatomy across the life span? Third, how does emotional brain neuroanatomy mediate the impact of social life on emotional processing? The goal of the proposed work is to answer these questions. To that end, I will first characterize individual?s social roles using formal social network analyses. Such analyses provide information about the number of social connections an individual has, but also about what specific role the individual plays in that network. Individuals will then undergo neuroimaging in order to characterize the structure and functional connectivity neuroanatomical regions of interest. They will also complete testing to characterize their emotional processing. I will first examine whether social role influences brain neuroanatomy and emotional processing using a cross sectional study with adult subjects (Specific Aims 1, 3). Next I will examine whether social roles early in development influence neuroanatomy and the capacity for developing new social relationships across a critical developmental period (childhood through young adulthood) using an experimental longitudinal study design (Specific Aim 2, 3). Together, these data will allow for the evaluation of the impact of social roles on emotional processing as mediated by neuroanatomy across the life-span.
Designing effective social interventions to treat and prevent mental illness requires understanding the biological mechanism by which social relationships influence wellbeing. The proposed research investigates how the role an individual plays in his or her social world impacts the neuroanatomy of brain areas responsible for generating and regulating emotions and his or her emotional life.
|Bliss-Moreau, Eliza; Moadab, Gilda; Santistevan, Anthony et al. (2017) The effects of neonatal amygdala or hippocampus lesions on adult social behavior. Behav Brain Res 322:123-137|
|Bliss-Moreau, Eliza; Moadab, Gilda; Machado, Christopher J (2017) Monkeys preferentially process body information while viewing affective displays. Emotion 17:765-771|
|Bliss-Moreau, Eliza; Moadab, Gilda; Capitanio, John P (2017) Maternal rearing environment impacts autonomic nervous system activity. Dev Psychobiol 59:551-556|
|Moadab, Gilda; Bliss-Moreau, Eliza; Bauman, Melissa D et al. (2017) Early amygdala or hippocampus damage influences adolescent female social behavior during group formation. Behav Neurosci 131:68-82|
|Chua, Elizabeth F; Bliss-Moreau, Eliza (2016) Knowing your heart and your mind: The relationships between metamemory and interoception. Conscious Cogn 45:146-158|
|Moadab, Gilda; Bliss-Moreau, Eliza; Amaral, David G (2015) Adult social behavior with familiar partners following neonatal amygdala or hippocampus damage. Behav Neurosci 129:339-50|