This subproject is one of many research subprojects utilizing the resources provided by a Center grant funded by NIH/NCRR. The subproject and investigator (PI) may have received primary funding from another NIH source, and thus could be represented in other CRISP entries. The institution listed is for the Center, which is not necessarily the institution for the investigator. Combined aerobic and resistance training have unique benefits for maintaining a physical activity (PA). However, the optimal training program for combining these two modes of training in older adults is unknown. Traditionally 3 d/wk combined training has been felt to be optimal while recent studies suggest 1 d/wk combined training may create similar adaptations as more frequent training. However, our previous and ongoing studies suggest that 1 d/wk combined aerobic and resistance training (C1) may be insufficient stimulus to induce optimal adaptations and that 3 d/wk combined training (C3) may be too frequent a stimulus for older adults. This study will enable us to compare the effects of C1 , 2 d/wk combined training (C2), and C3 on fitness, body composition, ease of PA, PA, and total free-living energy expenditure (TEE). We hypothesize that C2 will result in a larger increase in muscle size, bone density, strength, aerobic capacity, power, ease of PA, PA, and TEE than either C1 or C3. Objectives: We will examine changes in circulating cytokines, mood states, muscle size, bone density, aerobic capacity, strength, power, ease of PA, PA, and TEE following 16 and 32 wks training. Design: We will evaluate 78 (>60 yrs) Black and White women matched for age, race, and BMI into C1, C2, or C3 groups prior to, after 16, and after 32 wks training. Significance: This study should provide insight into the effects combined training frequency has on improving fitness, ease of PA, and maintenance of a high TEE.
Showing the most recent 10 out of 570 publications
