A major goal of Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) is to conduct a vibrant clinical research program, providing a portfolio of scientifically excellent clinical trials for our patients, support for the clinical research efforts of our faculty, and improved strategies for cancer detection, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention through our clinical research activities. As an NCI-designated Cancer Center with a strong foundation in cancer-focused research, we have both an opportunity and a responsibility to translate our discoveries to impact patient care. To achieve this objective, we must have in place a robust Protocol Review and Monitoring System (PRMS) to review the scientific merit of proposed clinical studies, evaluate the contribution of proposed protocols to the strategic aims of our Cancer Center, and assess the scientific progress of ongoing studies. When Dr. Beckerie was appointed Executive Director of HCI in August 2006, our PRMS faced significant challenges. The HCI PRMS had been disapproved at the time of our 2003 competing review. Although reevaluations in 2004 and 2005 recognized evidence of improvement, the review teams noted ongoing deficiencies. Dr. Beckerie highlighted the critical need for excellence in our institutional PRMS, developed a step-wise approach to analyze and improve the PRMS with internal analysis, multiple external Cancer Center consultants, HCI site-visits to other Cancer Centers, and input from our External Advisory Board. By integrating these recommendations, substantial changes to our PRMS were made. HCI's PRMS was formally reviewed and unconditionally approved by NCI in December 2008. PRMS functions at HCI are fulfilled by the Clinical Cancer Investigations Committee (CCIC). The CCIC: 1) conducts thorough scientific review of all cancer-related studies performed at HCI, 2) prioritizes research protocols and prevents protocol competition, 3) prioritizes protocols for access to HCI Clinical Trials Office support, 4) evaluates ongoing protocols for continued progress toward accrual goals, 5) reviews and approves protocol amendments, and 6) closes under-accruing trials. Before a study can be presented to the CCIC, it must be submitted to the appropriate multidisciplinary disease group for review, approval, and priority rating. CCIC protocol review follows a standardized format in which reviewers are tasked to respond to a set of review criteria; an electronic management and notification system aids in the PRMS process. The CCIC has broad and extensive expertise in oncology to ensure that clinical protocols and assessment of progress are reviewed at a high scientific level, including representatives from Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Biostatistics, Pharmacology, Pathology, Basic Science, and Population Science, Research Nursing, and a Patient Advocate, as well as HCI's Executive Director Mary Beckerie, PhD, and Scott Lloyd, MBA, Senior Director of Administration and Finance, as ex-officio members.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
3P30CA042014-23S1
Application #
8533402
Study Section
Subcommittee G - Education (NCI)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2012-05-01
Budget End
2013-04-30
Support Year
23
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$3,408
Indirect Cost
$1,128
Name
University of Utah
Department
Type
DUNS #
009095365
City
Salt Lake City
State
UT
Country
United States
Zip Code
84112
Sample, Danielle C; Samadder, N Jewel; Pappas, Lisa M et al. (2018) Variables affecting penetrance of gastric and duodenal phenotype in familial adenomatous polyposis patients. BMC Gastroenterol 18:115
Barrott, Jared J; Illum, Benjamin E; Jin, Huifeng et al. (2018) Paracrine osteoprotegerin and ?-catenin stabilization support synovial sarcomagenesis in periosteal cells. J Clin Invest 128:207-218
Madsen, Michael J; Knight, Stacey; Sweeney, Carol et al. (2018) Reparameterization of PAM50 Expression Identifies Novel Breast Tumor Dimensions and Leads to Discovery of a Genome-Wide Significant Breast Cancer Locus at 12q15. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27:644-652
Delker, Don A; Wood, Austin C; Snow, Angela K et al. (2018) Chemoprevention with Cyclooxygenase and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patients: mRNA Signatures of Duodenal Neoplasia. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 11:4-15
Wu, Yelena P; Parsons, Bridget G; Mooney, Ryan et al. (2018) Barriers and Facilitators to Melanoma Prevention and Control Behaviors Among At-Risk Children. J Community Health 43:993-1001
Trott, Daniel W; Henson, Grant D; Ho, Mi H T et al. (2018) Age-related arterial immune cell infiltration in mice is attenuated by caloric restriction or voluntary exercise. Exp Gerontol 109:99-107
Zabriskie, Matthew S; Antelope, Orlando; Verma, Anupam R et al. (2018) A novel AGGF1-PDGFRb fusion in pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 103:e87-e91
Wolff, Roger K; Hoffman, Michael D; Wolff, Erica C et al. (2018) Mutation analysis of adenomas and carcinomas of the colon: Early and late drivers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 57:366-376
Hellwig, Sabine; Nix, David A; Gligorich, Keith M et al. (2018) Automated size selection for short cell-free DNA fragments enriches for circulating tumor DNA and improves error correction during next generation sequencing. PLoS One 13:e0197333
Fleming, Aaron M; Zhu, Judy; Ding, Yun et al. (2018) Human DNA Repair Genes Possess Potential G-Quadruplex Sequences in Their Promoters and 5'-Untranslated Regions. Biochemistry 57:991-1002

Showing the most recent 10 out of 1193 publications