Each year, more than 700,000 US adults elect total joint replacement (TJR) surgery to restore physical function and eliminate the pain of advanced knee or hip arthritis that persists despite comprehensive medical treatment. Despite broad use, wide variation persists in surgical practice and outcomes. Furthermore, there is a lack of comparative effectiveness data to guide surgeon and patient decisions on optimal implant timing, surgical approach, implant selection, and peri-operative management to prevent adverse sequelae and revision. Therefore, the National Orthopedic Outcome Registry (NOOR) and Cohort Study will establish a national registry of over 33,000 diverse patients of 130 orthopedic surgeons representing all regions of the country and varied hospital and surgeon practice settings. As such, the registry is designed to reflect typical US clinical practice, rather than focusing exclusively on high-volume academic centers. Data will include baseline patient attributes;procedure approach and technology;hospital course;surgeon and institutional characteristics;longitudinal patient function, post-procedure complications and revisions, and serum/DNA samples. Web-based data collection will enhance efficient data gathering. The research team will develop new outcome measures and will determine the relative contributions of patient factors, technology use, and delivery factors to (1) early functional failure and (2) adverse post-arthroplasty events;(3) examine disparities in TJR use and outcome, seeking to elucidate root causes;and (4) conduct economic analyses to determine the personal and societal value of TJR in working aged adults. A national network of orthopedists will partner with innovative scientists with expertise in large-scale registry development and implementation, web-based technology, outcome measurement, and statistical techniques to assure success. Sound governance principles will ensure efficient implementation. The registry will actively encourage ancillary research to assure optimal use of all data and biomaterials. We propose to transform the network of clinical centers and orthopedic offices into a research laboratory that will serve as a national model for comparative effectiveness research.

Public Health Relevance

The proposed national orthopedic outcome registry will collect important patient, surgical, and delivery setting data to answer critical patient and surgeon questions about optimal implant selection, surgical timing and approach, and peri-operative care for the large number of patients who undergo total joint replacement and other procedures each year. Research will also address TJR value in young patients and use disparities,

National Institute of Health (NIH)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZHS1-HSR-O (01))
Program Officer
Berliner, Elise
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester
Schools of Medicine
United States
Zip Code
Zheng, Hua; Rosal, Milagros C; Li, Wenjun et al. (2018) A Web-Based Treatment Decision Support Tool for Patients With Advanced Knee Arthritis: Evaluation of User Interface and Content Design. JMIR Hum Factors 5:e17
Li, Wenjun; Ayers, David C; Lewis, Courtland G et al. (2017) Functional Gain and Pain Relief After Total Joint Replacement According to Obesity Status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1183-1189
Gandek, Barbara; Ware Jr, John E (2017) Validity and Responsiveness of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: A Comparative Study Among Total Knee Replacement Patients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 69:817-825
Franklin, Patricia D (2017) Research Priorities for Optimal Use of Patient-reported Outcomes in Quality and Outcome Improvement for Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25 Suppl 1:S51-S54
Lemay, Celeste A; Lewis, Courtland G; Singh, Jasvinder A et al. (2017) Receipt of Pain Management Information Preoperatively Is Associated With Improved Functional Gain After Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1763-1768
Zheng, Hua; Tulu, Bengisu; Choi, Wonchan et al. (2017) Using mHealth App to Support Treatment Decision-Making for Knee Arthritis: Patient Perspective. EGEMS (Wash DC) 5:7
Franklin, Patricia D; Miozzari, Hermes; Christofilopoulos, Panayiotis et al. (2017) Important patient characteristics differ prior to total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty between Switzerland and the United States. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:14
Rolfson, Ola; Wissig, Stephanie; van Maasakkers, Lisa et al. (2016) Defining an International Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Consensus of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Working Group. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 68:1631-1639
Nguyen, Uyen-Sa D T; Ayers, David C; Li, Wenjun et al. (2016) Preoperative Pain and Function: Profiles of Patients Selected for Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:2402-2407.e2
Chimenti, Peter C; Drinkwater, Christopher J; Li, Wenjun et al. (2016) Factors Associated With Early Improvement in Low Back Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Analyses. J Arthroplasty 31:176-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 24 publications