This project will examine the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and health over the life-course in two 'transition' economies, China and Russia. While the SES-health relationship has become of increased interest across a variety of disciplines, the majority of this work has focused on the most developed nations. Further, most studies have focused only on establishing the empirical correlation, with less attention to the specific channels through which it arises, or even direction of causality. To address these gaps, this project contains 6 interrelated components: 1) document the SES-health relationship for China and Russia, including how the relationship has changed over time, and the role of various explanatory factors; 2) examine the relationship between nutrition, food choice and income, and the implications for health; 3) explore the health consequences of various 'psychosocial' factors, such as economic stress, inequality and rank; 4) examine the short- and long-term health effects of economic shocks, and the range of strategies used to cope with such shocks; 5) examine the long-run health and income effects of childhood economic shocks; 6) examine the distribution of resources within extended, multigenerational households, and the implications for health. ? ?

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01AG020994-01A1
Application #
6613627
Study Section
Social Sciences, Nursing, Epidemiology and Methods 4 (SNEM)
Program Officer
Patmios, Georgeanne E
Project Start
2003-04-15
Project End
2008-03-31
Budget Start
2003-04-15
Budget End
2004-03-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2003
Total Cost
$228,074
Indirect Cost
Name
National Bureau of Economic Research
Department
Type
DUNS #
054552435
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02138
Jensen, Robert T; Miller, Nolan H (2011) DO CONSUMER PRICE SUBSIDIES REALLY IMPROVE NUTRITION? Rev Econ Stat 93:1205-1223
Jensen, Robert T; Miller, Nolan H (2008) Giffen Behavior and Subsistence Consumption. Am Econ Rev 98:1553-1577