Recently, several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been published for late onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). Each GWAS that has been published to date has mapped the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) locus as the strongest LOAD risk signal within the human genome. This has led us and others to hypothesize that this large signal can 1. Overwhelm other smaller effects that are in epitasis with the APOE E4 locus and 2. Be de-convoluted into multiple risk loci mapping to the same area of the genome. The first hypothesis is plausible, considering that in our previous GWAS we mapped an effect that was only present in APOE E4 positive individuals. The second hypothesis is also valid in that this type of effect (i.e. multiple risk loci mapping to the same region of the genome) has been seen in other neurological diseases. For example, for Fronto-temporal Dementia Linked to Chromosome 17 (FTDP-17), mutations in both the microtubule associated protein Tau gene (MAPT) as well as Progranulin (PRGN) have been found. Both MAPT and PRGN map within the same linkage peak on chromosome 17. Thus, we propose to leverage our genome-wide and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) genetic data, as well as transcriptome and proteome datasets to map novel risk loci for LOAD that are acting either in epistasis with or independently of the APOE E4 allele. We propose the following: To test our APOE E4 independent effects, we will perform additional NGS sequencing within the same region of chromosome 19 to capture additional effects (Aim 1a). We will also genotype the variants we found from our NGS in additional case control samples to determine whether they act independently of APOE E4 to increase risk for disease (Aim 1b). To follow our APOE E4 epistatic effects, SNPs which we found to act in conjunction with APOE E4 will be followed by examining an additional cohort (Aim 2a) as well as sequencing within the region to find additional variants (Aim 2b). Finally, we will map the downstream effects of any variants we map in Aims 1 or 2 by examining transcript expression and protein profiles (Aim 3), Our collaboration possesses the unique skills and datasets to perform this work. Drs. Huentelman and Myers have worked together for the greater part of their careers and have co-authored many publications using similar techniques as those proposed in this application. They have access to a unique cohort of ~ 1600 neuropathologically verified individuals, which will allow for both the analysis of risk variation as well as the downstream changes of those variants. They have recruited an additional cohort of ~ 18,000 clinically characterized samples from the University of Cardiff to replicate any effects. They also have access to both the computational power (48-core / 576GB memory computer and a separate 2,700-core cluster through Tgen and one of 5000 CPU at the University of Miami) as well as the expertise to execute the bioinformatics analysis involved in all Aims.
Our proposal seeks to understand whether there are additional risk genes and variants which act either independently or in synergy with the APOE E4 gene variant on chromosome 19. We will examine 1) Genome- wide association data, and 2) Novel DNA changes we have found through Next Generation and Sanger sequencing analysis looking at both risk for Alzheimer's disease as well as changes in gene and protein expression. We anticipate that several of these novel variants are involved in risk as well as changing the downstream function of their target genes.
|Escott-Price, Valentina; Myers, Amanda J; Huentelman, Matt et al. (2017) Polygenic risk score analysis of pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol 82:311-314|
|Sims, Rebecca (see original citation for additional authors) (2017) Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet 49:1373-1384|
|Karch, Celeste M; Ezerskiy, Lubov A; Bertelsen, Sarah et al. (2016) Alzheimer's Disease Risk Polymorphisms Regulate Gene Expression in the ZCWPW1 and the CELF1 Loci. PLoS One 11:e0148717|
|Mez, Jesse; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Thornton, Timothy et al. (2016) The executive prominent/memory prominent spectrum in Alzheimer's disease is highly heritable. Neurobiol Aging 41:115-121|
|Ridge, Perry G; Hoyt, Kaitlyn B; Boehme, Kevin et al. (2016) Assessment of the genetic variance of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 41:200.e13-200.e20|
|Hohman, Timothy J; Bush, William S; Jiang, Lan et al. (2016) Discovery of gene-gene interactions across multiple independent data sets of late onset Alzheimer disease from the Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium. Neurobiol Aging 38:141-150|
|Ebbert, Mark T W; Boehme, Kevin L; Wadsworth, Mark E et al. (2016) Interaction between variants in CLU and MS4A4E modulates Alzheimer's disease risk. Alzheimers Dement 12:121-129|
|Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Walter, Stefan; Kauwe, John S K et al. (2015) Genetically predicted body mass index and Alzheimer's disease-related phenotypes in three large samples: Mendelian randomization analyses. Alzheimers Dement 11:1439-1451|
|Østergaard, Søren D; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Sharp, Stephen J et al. (2015) Associations between Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors and Alzheimer Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study. PLoS Med 12:e1001841; discussion e1001841|
|Fleisher, Adam S; Chen, Kewei; Quiroz, Yakeel T et al. (2015) Associations between biomarkers and age in the presenilin 1 E280A autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease kindred: a cross-sectional study. JAMA Neurol 72:316-24|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 23 publications