Delirium, consisting of the acute onset of inattention, global cognitive impairment, and other neuropsychiatric symptoms, is a common, serious, and often preventable syndrome among hospitalized and institutionalized elders. At a cost of over $118 billion per year, delirium is associated with adverse outcomes including persistent cognitive decline, loss of independence, and death. A major challenge in advancing treatment trials and prognostic studies has been inadequacies in the current measurement of delirium severity, such as a tendency to overweight hyperactive features or to require highly skilled clinician raters. To address these limitations, our goal is to develop a Delirium Severity Toolkit,a dynamic set of six new measures developed with expert clinical judgment and patient/family/nurse input using modern psychometric theory. Our measures will capture the severity of delirium in various phenomenological presentations (e.g., hypoactive, hyperactive), incorporate multiple perspectives (patient, family member, and nurse), will be useful to a broad array of stakeholders (physicians, nurses, patients, family caregivers, researchers, and policy-makers), and will be developed using state-of-the-art procedures that combine qualitative and quantitative approaches such as those developed and utilized in current major NIH-supported measurement initiatives (e.g., PROMIS, NIH Toolbox, Neuro-QOL). Moreover, our development work will be in compliance with FDA guidance on instrument development to assure applicability for future clinical trials.
Our aims are to (1) develop clinical measures of delirium severity that reflect the presence and intensity of multiple dimensions of symptoms; (2) compare these against subjective ratings of delirium severity by patient, family, and nurses; and (3) determine the predictive validity of the measures of delirium severity against adverse clinical outcomes (e.g., functional decline, hospital or post-acute length of stay, institutionalization, healthcare utilization and costs). In the course of instrument development we will demonstrate face, content, and criterion validity, and test responsiveness to change and reliability. To accomplish our aims, we will convene panels of clinical experts, conduct in-depth qualitative interviews with 30 patients, 30 family members, and 30 nurses; develop and refine delirium severity instruments, conduct a field study in 300 patients on 3 services (medicine, surgery, and post-acute care), calibrate and publish final versions (short, long, and computerized adaptive versions) of our 6 delirium severity measures that are ready to use in clinical and research settings. Our approach is innovative since it will fundamentally advance the conceptualization of delirium severity, result in new measures that address limitations in current severity measures, and provide a publicly available item bank for ongoing improvement, validation, and dissemination. We believe that the proposed measurement is essential to advance our understanding of the syndrome of delirium and our ability to effectively treat this important problem.
Our work is of public health importance because delirium is a common clinical syndrome impacting about 12 million older Americans and costing over $118 billion (2011 dollars) per year in healthcare expenditures. Long term consequences include increased risks of death, dementia, and prolonged disability. Delirium is preventable and treatable, but we must have good measures of delirium severity to test the effectiveness of treatment on relevant clinical outcomes, to reduce healthcare utilization, and to minimize trauma to the patients and burden to family members and nurses.
|Kim, Dae Hyun; Mahesri, Mufaddal; Bateman, Brian T et al. (2018) Longitudinal Trends and Variation in Antipsychotic Use in Older Adults After Cardiac Surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:1491-1498|
|Gross, Alden L; Tommet, Doug; D'Aquila, Madeline et al. (2018) Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98, MDAS, and CAM-S using item response theory. BMC Med Res Methodol 18:92|
|Lilley, Elizabeth J; Cooper, Zara; Schwarze, Margaret L et al. (2018) Palliative Care in Surgery: Defining the Research Priorities. Ann Surg 267:66-72|
|Hshieh, Tammy T; Fong, Tamara G; Schmitt, Eva M et al. (2018) The Better Assessment of Illness Study for Delirium Severity: Study Design, Procedures, and Cohort Description. Gerontology :1-10|
|Mudge, Alison M; McRae, Prue; Hubbard, Ruth E et al. (2018) Hospital-Associated Complications of Older People: A Proposed Multicomponent Outcome for Acute Care. J Am Geriatr Soc :|
|Lilley, Elizabeth J; Lee, Katherine C; Scott, John W et al. (2018) The impact of inpatient palliative care on end-of-life care among older trauma patients who die after hospital discharge. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 85:992-998|
|Racine, Annie M; Gou, Yun; Fong, Tamara G et al. (2018) Correction for retest effects across repeated measures of cognitive functioning: a longitudinal cohort study of postoperative delirium. BMC Med Res Methodol 18:69|
|Inouye, Sharon K (2018) Delirium-A Framework to Improve Acute Care for Older Persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:446-451|
|Racine, Annie M; Fong, Tamara G; Gou, Yun et al. (2018) Clinical outcomes in older surgical patients with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement 14:590-600|
|Fick, Donna M; Inouye, Sharon K; McDermott, Caroline et al. (2018) Pilot Study of a Two-Step Delirium Detection Protocol Administered By Certified Nursing Assistants, Physicians, and Registered Nurses. J Gerontol Nurs 44:18-24|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 34 publications