Established by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Star Ratings system for Medicare Parts C&D (Star Ratings, hereafter) is a health plan quality reporting system with associated bonus payments and enrollment incentives for health plans since 2012. Researchers have reported the disparity implications of Star Ratings: e.g., racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to be excluded from measure calculation for diabetes adherence than non-Hispanic whites, thus minorities may be more likely to be excluded from quality improvement initiations for this measure, potentially worsening disparities in health. A critical barrier for resolving such disparities is that comprehensive policy recommendation related to effects of Star Ratings on racial/ethnic disparities is not available. The goals of this project are to ensure that Star Ratings include a set of measures that address disparities in measure calculation, and to evaluate the effects of Star Ratings bonus payments on reducing racial/ethnic disparities in medication utilization. Our strategies are to (1) add to Star Ratings medication utilization measures selected from Pharmacy Quality Alliance measure concept inventory (PMCI), and other commonly used medication utilization (CUMU) measures (Star Plus, hereafter), and (2) compare racial/ethnic disparities in medication utilization before and after the implementation of bonus payments, and between counties with ?double bonuses? and those with regular bonuses. A project focusing on only medication utilization measures in Star Ratings is warranted because these measures account for a high percentage in Star Ratings scores (45% in Part D in 2013) and their correlation with other measures is only moderate. Bonus payments are associated with improved plan benefit structure, which may reduce racial/ethnic disparities in medication utilization. In the prior grant period we found that selecting appropriate medication utilization measures may resolve racial/ethnic disparities associated with a Medicare Part D policy. Our objective of this continuation project is to conduct an analysis of Medicare Parts A/B/D data (2010-2015), linked to Area Health Resources Files, Orange Book Data Files, and CMS data on double/regular-bonus counties. We will also conduct disease-specific analysis.
Aim 1 : Test the hypothesis that using the medication utilization measures in current Star Ratings negatively affects the health of racial/ethnic minorities.
Aim 2 : Test the hypothesis that using Star Plus can lead to a reduction in racial/ethnic disparities associated with Star Ratings.
Aim 3 : Test the hypothesis that the Star Ratings bonus payments are associated with reduction in racial/ethnic disparities in medication utilization. Our expected outcome is to provide policy recommendations to resolve important disparity issues in Star Ratings among diverse older adults. Impact: This project will help to align disparity reduction goals with rapidly-proliferating pay-for-performance and public-reporting initiatives. This project is responsive to the National Institute on Aging's mission-driven strategic goal to ?understand health disparities and develop strategies to improve the health status of older adults in diverse populations.?
The goals of this project are to evaluate effects of Medicare Parts C&D Star Ratings (Star Ratings, hereafter) bonus payments on racial and ethnic disparities and ensure that Star Ratings include a set of measures that address the disparities in measure calculation. Our expected outcome is to produce comprehensive policy recommendations to resolve important disparity issues in Star Ratings among older adults in diverse populations. Our project will (1) provide the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services with information needed to align disparity reduction goals with rapidly-proliferating pay-for-performance and public-reporting initiatives; and (2) provide the National Institute on Aging with support to achieve its strategic goal of ?understanding health disparities and develop strategies to improve the health status of older adults in diverse populations.?
|Qiao, Yanru; Spivey, Christina A; Wang, Junling et al. (2018) Higher Predictive Value Positive for MMA Than ACA MTM Eligibility Criteria Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities: An Observational Study. Inquiry 55:46958018795749|
|Spivey, Christina A; Wang, Junling; Qiao, Yanru et al. (2018) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Meeting MTM Eligibility Criteria Based on Star Ratings Compared with the Medicare Modernization Act. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 24:97-107|
|Alamri, Abdulrahman; Alawlah, Yousef A; Qiao, Yanru et al. (2018) A retrospective review of treatment patterns of antiemetic agents for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. SAGE Open Med 6:2050312118767234|
|Lu, Degan; Qiao, Yanru; Johnson, Karen C et al. (2017) Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting MTM eligibility criteria among patients with asthma. J Asthma 54:504-513|
|Wang, Junling; Qiao, Yanru; Spivey, Christina A et al. (2016) Disparity Implications of Proposed 2015 Medicare Eligibility Criteria for Medication Therapy Management Services. J Pharm Health Serv Res 7:209-215|
|Jamison, JoEllen Jarrett; Wang, Junling; Surbhi, Satya et al. (2016) Impact of Medicare Part D on Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Divers Equal Health Care 13:326-333|
|Bess, D Todd; Taylor, Jade; Schwab, Carol A et al. (2016) An Innovative Approach to Pharmacy Law Education Utilizing a Mock Board of Pharmacy Meeting. Innov Pharm 7:|