Vaccines prevent illness both by decreasing individual risk of acquiring illness and preventing transmission. Clinical trials for testing vaccines have classically focused on disease prevention. with random assignment to individuals. However, other outcome measures and randomization to family or other units may be desirable. We will develop and apply a general methodology for assessing the consequences of vaccine trial design decisions using computer simulations that model a broad range of factors known to influence infection transmission and control. The specific vaccine to be examined is one that is under development for non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi). a common cause of otitis media and sinusitis. Specifically, we propose to: (1) determine the power to detect useful effects of trial designs that randomize vaccine and placebo to individuals, family units, or daycare centers; (2) determine how well the effect parameters estimated from these different designs predict the ability of vaccination programs to control infection; (3) determine the sensitivity of power and predictive accuracy of vaccine trial designs to: (a) details in the trial design such as whether clinical otitis or nasopharyngeal culture is used as an outcome; (b) transmission dynamics in the study population; (c) biological aspects of NTHi infection; (d) biological effects of the vaccines; (4) determine whether standard statistical methods erroneously assess the significance and power of vaccine effect measurements. The sensitivity analysis will be performed using recent advances in the area of response surface analysis and experimental design. The models to be simulated represent a significant advance in combining analytical tractability with flexibility to include geographic and social space determinants of contact patterns, biologically defined vaccine effects, and detailed natural histories of infection. The analysis performed will provide the vaccine trial designer with comparisons of power and predictive accuracy that reveal the relative trial sizes, data completeness. and data accuracy that are needed to attain comparable utility from different trial designs. They will also provide insight regarding how different biological effects of vaccines generate different population effects of vaccine programs.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01AI045168-01A1
Application #
6128200
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-VACC (01))
Program Officer
Klein, David L
Project Start
2000-04-01
Project End
2003-03-30
Budget Start
2000-04-01
Budget End
2001-03-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2000
Total Cost
$291,253
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Michigan Ann Arbor
Department
Public Health & Prev Medicine
Type
Schools of Public Health
DUNS #
791277940
City
Ann Arbor
State
MI
Country
United States
Zip Code
48109
Ness, Roberta B; Koopman, James S; Roberts, Mark S (2007) Causal system modeling in chronic disease epidemiology: a proposal. Ann Epidemiol 17:564-8
Lin, Ximin; Koopman, James S; Chick, Stephen E (2007) Mathematical model comparisons of potential non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae vaccine effects. J Theor Biol 245:66-76
Riggs, T; Koopman, J S (2005) Maximizing statistical power in group-randomized vaccine trials. Epidemiol Infect 133:993-1008
Koopman, James S; Simon, Carl P; Riolo, Chris P (2005) When to control endemic infections by focusing on high-risk groups. Epidemiology 16:621-7
Riggs, T W; Koopman, J S (2004) A stochastic model of vaccine trials for endemic infections using group randomization. Epidemiol Infect 132:927-38
Koopman, James S; Chick, Stephen E; Simon, Carl P et al. (2002) Stochastic effects on endemic infection levels of disseminating versus local contacts. Math Biosci 180:49-71
Chick, S E; Barth-Jones, D C; Koopman, J S (2001) Bias reduction for risk ratio and vaccine effect estimators. Stat Med 20:1609-24