The advent of newly discovered efficacious tools for the prevention of HIV creates a new challenge and the need for new paradigms: How do we assess the impact of combinations of HIV prevention tools in ethical ways, when we have evidence that individually they work to reduce HIV transmission? How do we roll out efficacious strategies, but assess their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in real-world settings at scale? In a powerful collaboration between four of the major HIV preventive interventions currently underway - including Harvard's Botswana Community Prevention Project and Familia Salama study of PMTCT, Vanderbilt and Imperial's PopART project, and the Africa Centre's Treatment as Prevention trial, our proposal, entitled New methods for the design and evaluation of large HIV prevention interventions will address key gaps in the available methodologies for the design and analysis of these large- scale HIV preventive intervention projects. After extensive dialogue with the Principal Investigators and other key personnel on these projects (three of whom are Co-investigators of this proposal), we have identified our specific aims as: 1) To develop and validate novel network methods to improve the evaluation of large combination prevention clinical trials 2) To develop advanced statistical methods to improve the design and evaluation of large- scale HIV prevention studies. 3) To augment prevention trial designs to adjust for bias due to loss to follow-up and to assess infectiousness and indirect effects. 4) To disentangle and evaluate the effects of specific interventions that comprise a 'package' as in the Harvard-Botswana and HPTN 061/PopART trials

Public Health Relevance

The identification of efficacious tools for the prevention of HIV infection creates new opportunities for disease eradication, as well as the need for new analytical paradigms to make the most of them. In a powerful collaboration among investigators representing four of the major HIV prevention studies currently underway - including the Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP), the Familia Salama study of PMTCT, the HPTN 071/PopART trial, and the Africa Centre's Treatment as Prevention trial, our proposal will address key gaps in the available methodologies for the design and analysis of these large-scale projects. Specifically, we will develop and validate novel network methods to improve the evaluation of the impact of the interventions; we will develop methods for estimating the cost-effectiveness ratio from directly observed project data, and compare the performance of new approaches to those based on model-based simulations currently in use; we will develop methods and software for step wedge designs; we will augment prevention project designs to permit an adjustment for biased loss-to-follow-up and refusal to test; and we will develop modeling strategies for disentangling the effects of specific interventions that comprise a combination prevention 'package', as in the BCPP and HPTN 061/PopART trials.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01AI112339-03
Application #
9067317
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1)
Program Officer
Miller, Judith A
Project Start
2014-06-01
Project End
2018-05-31
Budget Start
2016-06-01
Budget End
2017-05-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2016
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Harvard University
Department
Public Health & Prev Medicine
Type
Schools of Public Health
DUNS #
149617367
City
Boston
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
Buchanan, Ashley L; Vermund, Sten H; Friedman, Samuel R et al. (2018) Assessing Individual and Disseminated Effects in Network-Randomized Studies. Am J Epidemiol 187:2449-2459
Vandormael, Alain; de Oliveira, Tulio; Tanser, Frank et al. (2018) High percentage of undiagnosed HIV cases within a hyperendemic South African community: a population-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health 72:168-172
Chetty, Terusha; Yapa, H Manisha N; Herbst, Carina et al. (2018) The MONARCH intervention to enhance the quality of antenatal and postnatal primary health services in rural South Africa: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 18:625
McGovern, Mark E; Canning, David; Bärnighausen, Till (2018) Accounting for non-response bias using participation incentives and survey design: An application using gift vouchers. Econ Lett 171:239-244
Yapa, H Manisha; Bärnighausen, Till (2018) Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities. Implement Sci 13:154
Harling, Guy; Gumede, Dumile; Shahmanesh, Maryam et al. (2018) Sources of social support and sexual behaviour advice for young adults in rural South Africa. BMJ Glob Health 3:e000955
Brennan, Alana T; Bor, Jacob; Davies, Mary-Ann et al. (2018) Medication Side Effects and Retention in HIV Treatment: A Regression Discontinuity Study of Tenofovir Implementation in South Africa and Zambia. Am J Epidemiol 187:1990-2001
Geldsetzer, Pascal; Fink, Günther; Vaikath, Maria et al. (2018) Sampling for Patient Exit Interviews: Assessment of Methods Using Mathematical Derivation and Computer Simulations. Health Serv Res 53:256-272
Ortblad, Katrina F; Chanda, Michael M; Musoke, Daniel Kibuuka et al. (2018) Acceptability of HIV self-testing to support pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in Uganda and Zambia: results from two randomized controlled trials. BMC Infect Dis 18:503
Hontelez, Jan A C; Bor, Jacob; Tanser, Frank C et al. (2018) HIV Treatment Substantially Decreases Hospitalization Rates: Evidence From Rural South Africa. Health Aff (Millwood) 37:997-1004

Showing the most recent 10 out of 31 publications