Despite recent diagnostic advances with MRI, femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) remains an important unsolved problem from the standpoint of surgical management. About 30,000 new cases present annually, with ON patients making up 10% to 20% of most total hip series (usually second only to osteoarthrosis). Because of their relative youth, as well as other factors, osteonecrosis patients have an alarming rate of prosthesis loosening. Of the limited alternatives for head-preserving surgical intervention, the clinical results from vascularized fibular grafting are among the most promising. As currently practiced, however, the crucial issue of maximizing the structural efficacy of the construct has been given relatively little attention. Recent data from the applicant laboratory and elsewhere indicate that the details of graft placement can be a major determinant of whether or not the procedure achieves its goal of substantially lowering stresses in the lesion. Since lesion involvement patterns and their associated structural compromise are highly variable, it is difficult to know intuitively what grafting position is most desirable for a given patient. In recent NIH-supported work, the applicants developed and validated a patient-specific finite element model that allows interactive study of the three-dimensional positioning of a bone graft in a necrotic femoral head. Using this model, they propose to conduct a series of clinically- grounded finite element stress analysis studies which they believe will result in practical guidelines for improved graft surgery. In multi- center prospective and retrospective series (Aim 1), they will build patient-specific finite element models of both ungrafted and grafted necrotic femoral heads, and will examine how clinical outcome correlates with the stress-to-strength ratio (SSR). To test whether or not contemporary surgical grafting practice consistently achieves reasonably maximal structural reinforcement (Aim 2), they will compare SSR's for surgically obtained graft positioning, versus those for ostensibly improved positioning identified intuitively and by formal mathematical optimization. Finally, to identify practical surgical guidelines which can result in optimal or near-optimal graft placement (Aim 3), they will conduct parametric studies of graft insertion depth, tilt, tip shape, circumferential orientation, and other factors, and they will undertake evaluations and refinements of a new drill guide designed to facilitate accurate graft placement intraoperatively. At the conclusion of the study, the applicants expect to have elucidated the major factors governing structurally efficacious cortical bone grafting in osteonecrosis.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
Research Project (R01)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Study Section (ORTH)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of Iowa
Schools of Medicine
Iowa City
United States
Zip Code
Brodt, M D; Swan, C C; Brown, T D (1998) Mechanical behavior of human morselized cancellous bone in triaxial compression testing. J Orthop Res 16:43-9
Schnieders, M J; Dave, S B; Morrow, D E et al. (1997) Assessing the accuracy of a prototype drill guide for fibular graft placement in femoral head necrosis. Iowa Orthop J 17:58-63
Sakamoto, J; Brown, T D (1996) Toward determining construct mechanical optimality for fibular bone grafting in femoral head osteonecrosis. Iowa Orthop J 16:79-87
Brown, T D; Pedersen, D R; Baker, K J et al. (1993) Mechanical consequences of core drilling and bone-grafting on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1358-67
Brown, T D; Baker, K J; Brand, R A (1992) Structural consequences of subchondral bone involvement in segmental osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Res 10:79-87
Baker, K J; Brown, T D; Brand, R A (1989) A finite-element analysis of the effects of intertrochanteric osteotomy on stresses in femoral head osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res :183-98