Rotator cuff tears affect about 40% of the population over age 60 and are a common cause of pain and disability. Approximately 250,000 rotator cuff repairs are performed in the United States each year, but healing following surgery is a significant challenge (e.g., 20-70% of surgical repairs fail) and post- operative shoulder function is unpredictable. There is also often a disconnect between repair tissue healing and shoulder function where patients have poor shoulder function (e.g., limited strength and pain) despite an intact repair or, conversely, excellent shoulder function despite a failed repair. Conventional clinical data (e.g., patient age, tear size) are not strong predictors of clinical outcome, and therefore this disconnect between healing and function remains difficult to explain. Recent research suggests that repair tension and repair tissue elongation may provide insight into post-operative healing and shoulder function that is not adequately provided by clinical data. However, the relationships between repair tension, repair tissue deformation, healing, and shoulder function are not well understood. The objectives of this application are to determine how rotator cuff repair affects shoulder motion, strength, and patient-reported outcomes, and to assess the influence of repair tension and repair tissue deformation on these outcomes. The rationale for this project is based on several important findings from our on-going work regarding the progression and treatment of rotator cuff tears: 1) rotator cuff pathology, even in the absence of symptoms, has a significant impact on shoulder function, 2) physical therapy improves clinical outcomes despite only minor changes in joint motion, 3) surgical repair appears to alter glenohumeral joint (GHJ) motion in a way that suggests excessive repair tension, and 4) shoulder motion, strength, and patient-reported pain/function scores are inter- related after surgery. Based on these findings and the purported roles of repair tension and repair tissue elongation, our central hypothesis is that repair tissue elongation (up to and including failure) is due, at least in part, to repair tension approaching or exceeding the mechanical capacity of the healing repair tissue. We also hypothesize that repair tissue deformation affects joint motion in ways that have a significant impact on strength and patient-reported outcomes. Our approach will be to conduct a longitudinal study that measures repair tension, repair tissue deformation, joint motion, strength, and patient-reported outcomes before and after surgical repair. The proposed research is innovative because it will use a state-of-the-art imaging technique to provide an accurate assessment of the mechanical progression of healing rotator cuff repair tissues. The contribution of this research will be significant because it will advance our understanding of how surgical repair influences shoulder function and clinical outcomes, ultimately leading to improved patient care.

Public Health Relevance

A rotator cuff tear is a common and painful condition that is often repaired surgically, but a significant percentage of rotator cuff repairs fail and shoulder function after surgery is unpredictable. This project will determine how rotator cuff repair affects shoulder motion, strength, and patient-reported outcomes, and how repair tension and repair tissue deformation influence these outcomes. The proposed research is relevant to public health because it will advance our understanding of the treatment of rotator cuff tears and will ultimately lead to improved patient care and lower medical costs.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01AR051912-09
Application #
9705850
Study Section
Skeletal Biology Structure and Regeneration Study Section (SBSR)
Program Officer
Washabaugh, Charles H
Project Start
2006-02-20
Project End
2023-05-31
Budget Start
2019-06-01
Budget End
2020-05-31
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2019
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Henry Ford Health System
Department
Type
DUNS #
073134603
City
Detroit
State
MI
Country
United States
Zip Code
48202
Baumer, Timothy G; Dischler, Jack; Mende, Veronica et al. (2017) Effects of asymptomatic rotator cuff pathology on in vivo shoulder motion and clinical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1064-1072
Baumer, Timothy G; Chan, Derek; Mende, Veronica et al. (2016) Effects of Rotator Cuff Pathology and Physical Therapy on In Vivo Shoulder Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With a Symptomatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear. Orthop J Sports Med 4:2325967116666506
Peltz, Cathryn D; Divine, George; Drake, Anne et al. (2015) Associations between in-vivo glenohumeral joint motion and morphology. J Biomech 48:3252-7
Peltz, Cathryn D; Haladik, Jeffrey A; Hoffman, Scott E et al. (2014) Associations among shoulder strength, glenohumeral joint motion, and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 43:220-6
Bey, Michael J; Peltz, Cathryn D; Ciarelli, Kristin et al. (2011) In vivo shoulder function after surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff: glenohumeral joint mechanics, shoulder strength, clinical outcomes, and their interaction. Am J Sports Med 39:2117-29
Bey, Michael J; Kline, Stephanie K; Zauel, Roger et al. (2010) In Vivo Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Contact Patterns. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2010:
Bishop, Jennifer L; Kline, Stephanie K; Aalderink, Kristopher J et al. (2009) Glenoid inclination: in vivo measures in rotator cuff tear patients and associations with superior glenohumeral joint translation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:231-6
Bey, Michael J; Kline, Stephanie K; Zauel, Roger et al. (2008) Measuring dynamic in-vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics: technique and preliminary results. J Biomech 41:711-4
Bey, Michael J; Brock, Stephanie K; Beierwaltes, William N et al. (2007) In vivo measurement of subacromial space width during shoulder elevation: technique and preliminary results in patients following unilateral rotator cuff repair. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22:767-73