When a new treatment becomes available, physicians must decide whether or when to adopt it into their practice. Knowledge of the results of randomized clinical trials and consensus conference recommendations do not necessarily ensure the adoption of appropriate treatments. Breast-conserving surgery became recognized as an appropriate option for many women with early breast cancer in the 1980's. We have already studied, in a cross-sectional fashion, the use of breast-conserving surgery by Medicare patients in 1986, and have demonstrated large differences in its use during that year, with utilization ranging from 3.5% to 21.2% in different states. Women treated in the South Atlantic, South Central and West North Central regions are less likely to receive the treatment. We, and others, have also shown the association of several patient and hospital characteristics with the use of breast-conserving therapy in that year. Specifically, patients under age 55 or over age 79 were more likely to receive conservative treatment Black women and patients with axillary nodal metastases were less likely. Patients treated at larger hospitals, urban hospitals, teaching hospitals, and hospitals with radiation or geriatric services were more likely to receive conservative therapy. While these factors were significant in predicting use of conservative surgery, they explained relatively little of the geographic variation we documented. The overall purpose of this proposal is to attempt to better understand the assimilation of new treatments into practice, by studying the temporal adoption of breast-conserving surgery over time, and to examine the effects of various possible determinants of the temporal adoption of the treatment.
Our specific aims are as follows: 1. Elucidate the effect of hospital characteristics, physician characteristics, and local area characteristics (ethnic, economic, educational, and seasonal) as predictors of the temporal adoption of breast-conserving surgery from 1984 to 1992. 2. Determine the effect of state legislative requirements for patient information regarding breast cancer treatment options on the assimilation of breast conserving surgery. 3. Determine the effect of early exposure to the technique of breast- conserving surgery (within the framework of clinical trials) on the subsequent early or late adoption of the treatment. This study will identify the dynamics of the diffusion of breast- conserving surgery by developing stochastic models using the longitudinal treatment data from 1984 to 1992.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
2R01CA054676-02A1
Application #
3199210
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (HCT)
Project Start
1991-04-01
Project End
1996-04-30
Budget Start
1993-05-24
Budget End
1994-04-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1993
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Medical College of Wisconsin
Department
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
073134603
City
Milwaukee
State
WI
Country
United States
Zip Code
53226
Nattinger, A B; Hoffmann, R G; Howell-Pelz, A et al. (1998) Effect of Nancy Reagan's mastectomy on choice of surgery for breast cancer by US women. JAMA 279:762-6
Nattinger, A B; McAuliffe, T L; Schapira, M M (1997) Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research. J Clin Epidemiol 50:939-45
Michalski, T A; Nattinger, A B (1997) The influence of black race and socioeconomic status on the use of breast-conserving surgery for Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer 79:314-9
Nattinger, A B; Hoffman, R G; Shapiro, R et al. (1996) The effect of legislative requirements on the use of breast-conserving surgery. N Engl J Med 335:1035-40
Nattinger, A B; Gottlieb, M S; Hoffman, R G et al. (1996) Minimal increase in use of breast-conserving surgery from 1986 to 1990. Med Care 34:479-89
Nattinger, A B; Gottlieb, M S; Veum, J et al. (1992) Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326:1102-7