Psychoeducational support groups (PSGs), which appear to be effective in enhancing quality of life in other cancer populations, may also be beneficial to men with prostate cancer. The proposed study aims to: (1) compare the relative effects of two PSGs on quality of life outcomes in men with prostate cancer (education versus education + peer discussion versus control group); (2) test whether PSGs enhance quality of life through two proposed mediators--enhanced cognitive processing and increases in perceived personal control (self-efficacy); and (3) determine whether education + peer discussion enhances quality of life above and beyond education alone by further enhancing cognitive processing, or whether particular people (i.e., those with unmet support needs) are more likely to benefit than others from the addition of peer discussion to education. To date, there have been no solid studies on the effects of psychoeducational support groups on the quality of life of men with prostate cancer. The study team's preliminary data suggest that prostate cancer patients mainly want education about the disease and how to manage the negative side-effects of treatment. In the proposed study, 252 men treated for prostate cancer will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions: education, education plus discussion, or control group (measurement only). The investigators will convene seven groups of 12 men for each of the three conditions. intervention groups will meet once a week for six consecutive weeks. Quality of life and mediator variables (e.g., perceived control, cognitive processing) will be measured once before the interventions and again 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the interventions. Preliminary data from a survey of men with prostate cancer (n=181) and a randomized group intervention (education + discussion versus control; n=24) were used to determine the content of the interventions, to test the conceptual model, and to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of running such groups for men with prostate cancer.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
7R01CA068354-04
Application #
6132944
Study Section
Behavioral Medicine Study Section (BEM)
Program Officer
Jeffery, Diana D
Project Start
1997-07-01
Project End
2001-06-30
Budget Start
1999-12-09
Budget End
2000-06-30
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
1999
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Brooklyn College
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
620127691
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
11210
Roberts, Katherine J; Lepore, Stephen J; Hanlon, Alexandra L et al. (2010) Genitourinary functioning and depressive symptoms over time in younger versus older men treated for prostate cancer. Ann Behav Med 40:275-83
Helgeson, Vicki S; Lepore, Stephen J; Eton, David T (2006) Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer. Health Psychol 25:348-54
Roberts, Katherine J; Lepore, Stephen J; Helgeson, Vicki (2006) Social-cognitive correlates of adjustment to prostate cancer. Psychooncology 15:183-92
Eton, David T; Lepore, Stephen J; Helgeson, Vicki S (2005) Psychological distress in spouses of men treated for early-stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer 103:2412-8
Lepore, Stephen J; Helgeson, Vicki S; Eton, David T et al. (2003) Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol 22:443-52
Eton, David T; Lepore, Stephen J (2002) Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 11:307-26
Eton, D T; Lepore, S J; Helgeson, V S (2001) Early quality of life in patients with localized prostate carcinoma: an examination of treatment-related, demographic, and psychosocial factors. Cancer 92:1451-9
Lepore, S J; Ragan, J D; Jones, S (2000) Talking facilitates cognitive-emotional processes of adaptation to an acute stressor. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:499-508