This new application from the University of Pennsylvania seeks to investigate primary care physician attitudes regarding the tradeoff between cost and quality in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. A survey, created in a factorial design varying several characteristics of the questions, will be sent to 4,000 randomly selected physicians to assess their attitudes regarding cost and quality decision. The questionnaire will pose several vignettes, randomly varied to provide slightly different amounts of information regarding the cost-effectiveness of the alternatives in the vignette and the financial situation of the physician and patient. The results will be analyzed with a combination of unadjusted comparisons of means and proportions. Multivariate analysis (linear and logistic regression) will be used to evaluate the covariates that may impact on the responses.
Jepson, Christopher; Asch, David A; Hershey, John C et al. (2005) In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol 58:103-5 |
Alexander, G Caleb; Werner, Rachel M; Ubel, Peter A (2004) The costs of denying scarcity. Arch Intern Med 164:593-6 |
Ubel, Peter A; Jepson, Christopher; Baron, Jonathan et al. (2003) The influence of cost-effectiveness information on physicians' cancer screening recommendations. Soc Sci Med 56:1727-36 |
Asch, David A; Jepson, Christopher; Hershey, John C et al. (2003) When money is saved by reducing healthcare costs, where do US primary care physicians think the money goes? Am J Manag Care 9:438-42 |
Ubel, Peter A; Jepson, Christopher; Asch, David A (2003) Misperceptions about beta-blockers and diuretics: a national survey of primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med 18:977-83 |
Beach, Mary Catherine; Asch, David A; Jepson, Christopher et al. (2003) Public response to cost-quality tradeoffs in clinical decisions. Med Decis Making 23:369-78 |
Hershey, John C; Asch, David A; Jepson, Christopher et al. (2003) Incremental and average cost-effectiveness ratios: will physicians make a distinction? Risk Anal 23:81-9 |
Boulis, Ann; Goold, Susan; Ubel, Peter A (2002) Responding to the immunoglobulin shortage: a case study. J Health Polit Policy Law 27:977-99 |
Ubel, P A; Baron, J; Asch, D A (2001) Preference for equity as a framing effect. Med Decis Making 21:180-9 |
Ubel, P A; Baron, J; Nash, B et al. (2000) Are preferences for equity over efficiency in health care allocation ""all or nothing""? Med Care 38:366-73 |