Modern informed consent procedures have been shaped by several factors. First, the ethical doctrine of informed consent is derived from a western philosophic tradition that emphasizes individual autonomy and respect for persons. Second, federal regulations governing human experimentation have established specific requirements for the informed consent process. Little data exist, however, concerning what information and presentation style will help potential subjects to understand the purpose and methods of a research study and make decisions that reflect their authentic preferences and values. The focus of this study will be to describe the disclosure and decision making process and to identify how informed decision making can be achieved. To accomplish this objective, the investigators propose to conduct a study that will ask subjects what they believe is important in making research participation decisions; in addition, behavioral decision analysis theory will be used to identify factors and processes that are associated with better outcomes. Three distinct subject populations will be examined: l) adult cancer patients; 2) critically ill children; 3) Alzheimer's disease patients.
The specific aims of this study are to: (l) examine and describe clinician-subject interactions during the consent process; (2) determine which factors are associated with informed decision making; (3) determine if there are different information and process needs for different subject populations; (4) update our understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of the informed consent process; (5) suggest alternative or modified mechanisms for enabling patients to make informed decisions about participation in research studies. This study will provide descriptive information about how informed consent is currently being obtained from potential subjects and will assess the different components of the decision making process to pinpoint which pieces are crucial to the ability of potential subjects to make informed choices about participation in a research study.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
3R01CA078210-03S1
Application #
6442458
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG2 (04))
Program Officer
Kelty, Miriam F
Project Start
1997-09-30
Project End
2002-03-31
Budget Start
1999-09-30
Budget End
2002-03-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$129,813
Indirect Cost
Name
Case Western Reserve University
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
077758407
City
Cleveland
State
OH
Country
United States
Zip Code
44106
Gandy, Sharon Z; Linnstaedt, Sarah D; Muralidhar, Sumitra et al. (2007) RNA editing of the human herpesvirus 8 kaposin transcript eliminates its transforming activity and is induced during lytic replication. J Virol 81:13544-51
Simon, Christian M; Siminoff, Laura A; Kodish, Eric D et al. (2004) Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology. J Clin Oncol 22:2708-17
Broome, Marion E; Kodish, Eric; Geller, Gail et al. (2003) Children in research: new perspectives and practices for informed consent. IRB Suppl 25:S20-S23