The risk of cancer associated with most missense mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes cannot be determined. Thus, when a missense mutation is identified in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes during clinical testing, the patient with the mutation and the patient's family members cannot benefit from improved risk assessment. The difficulty in interpreting whether the 1,600 known missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to cancer stems from the undefined influence of these mutations on BRCA1 and BRCA2 function. The hypotheses to be addressed in this proposal is that missense mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes can be defined as either cancer predisposing or of no clinical significance using a combination of genetic, epidemiological and molecular biological approaches. Missense mutations in the BRCA1 BRCT domains and the BRCA2 DNA binding domain will be characterized using (A) a likelihood model of cancer causality for missense mutations based on co- segregation of the mutations with cancer, co-occurrence of the mutations with other deleterious mutations, and on the family history profile of cancer in families carrying these mutations;(B) functional assays;(C) evolutionary sequence conservation analysis;and (D) a two-component mixture model that utilizes the data generated in A) - C). Each method will be used to evaluate missense mutations from these domains and to independently predict which mutations are deleterious or neutral. These data will also be combined in the two-component mixture model to generate a combined estimate of the cancer relevance of each missense mutation and to identify the assays/approaches that are most valuable for classifying missense mutations. Importantly, once the sensitivity and specificity of the functional assays and sequence conservation method have been determined for some of the more common mutations in conjunction with the genetic/family data it will then be possible to use these assays to define the cancer relevance of other rare missense mutations in these domains of BRCA1 and BRCA2, even in the absence of genetic data. At the conclusion of the study the cancer relevance of many missense mutations will have been determined and provided to the carriers who will then be able to benefit from improved cancer risk assessment, cancer prevention and perhaps even therapeutic strategies

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01CA116167-05
Application #
8035884
Study Section
Epidemiology of Cancer Study Section (EPIC)
Program Officer
Nelson, Stefanie A
Project Start
2007-03-15
Project End
2013-08-31
Budget Start
2011-03-01
Budget End
2013-08-31
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2011
Total Cost
$512,304
Indirect Cost
Name
Mayo Clinic, Rochester
Department
Type
DUNS #
006471700
City
Rochester
State
MN
Country
United States
Zip Code
55905
Rebbeck, Timothy R (see original citation for additional authors) (2018) Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Hum Mutat 39:593-620
Horne, Hisani N; Oh, Hannah; Sherman, Mark E et al. (2018) E-cadherin breast tumor expression, risk factors and survival: Pooled analysis of 5,933 cases from 12 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Sci Rep 8:6574
Lilyquist, Jenna; Ruddy, Kathryn J; Vachon, Celine M et al. (2018) Common Genetic Variation and Breast Cancer Risk-Past, Present, and Future. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27:380-394
Guidugli, Lucia; Shimelis, Hermela; Masica, David L et al. (2018) Assessment of the Clinical Relevance of BRCA2 Missense Variants by Functional and Computational Approaches. Am J Hum Genet 102:233-248
Hart, Steven N; Hoskin, Tanya; Shimelis, Hermela et al. (2018) Comprehensive annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants by functionally validated sequence-based computational prediction models. Genet Med :
Welsh, Jessemae L; Hoskin, Tanya L; Day, Courtney N et al. (2017) Clinical Decision-Making in Patients with Variant of Uncertain Significance in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Genes. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3067-3072
Barrdahl, Myrto; Rudolph, Anja; Hopper, John L et al. (2017) Gene-environment interactions involving functional variants: Results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Int J Cancer 141:1830-1840
Walker, Logan C; Marquart, Louise; Pearson, John F et al. (2017) Evaluation of copy-number variants as modifiers of breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers. Eur J Hum Genet 25:432-438
Hamdi, Yosr; Soucy, Penny; Kuchenbaeker, Karoline B et al. (2017) Association of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with genetic variants showing differential allelic expression: identification of a modifier of breast cancer risk at locus 11q22.3. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161:117-134
Couch, Fergus J; Shimelis, Hermela; Hu, Chunling et al. (2017) Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol 3:1190-1196

Showing the most recent 10 out of 107 publications