Recently, trials of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting have been completed in both the US (NCCTG/NSABP) and in Europe (the HERA trial) that have shown this drug can decrease the recurrence rate in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer. However in both trials, there are still a significant percentage of patients that recur on the drug. Similarly, numerous earlier trials in patients with metastatic cancer also showed a lack of response even though they had HER2 expressing tumors. These facts, combined with the facts that new drugs are now available that target HER family signaling pathways, suggest that new, more specific, companion diagnostics could be developed for trastuzumab that increase the specificity of selection of patients for this therapy. The underlying hypothesis of this proposal is that an optimal predictor of outcome for patients on trastuzumab can be achieved by combining multiple markers which predict response. We propose that using a set of novel techniques to interrogate HER2 tumors being treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy, we can define the optimal predictor and validate this classifier in a prospective trial. The techniques will include assessment of DNA, RNA and protein to determine the best modality for optimal prediction. Protein will be assessed using multiplexed immunofluoresence, RNA will be assessed using transcriptional microarray profiling and DNA will be assessed in the form of copy number analysis using high density SNP arrays. Each of these assays has the potential to be translated into a usable companion diagnostic assay for breast cancer patients. In this revised 2 year version. of this grant we propose to keep the analysis of all 3 modalities, but to only complete the training set aspects of the grant. We envision a follow-up submission in 18-24 months that shows the model resulting for the efforts of this project, then proposing validation of the model(s) on the CALGB 40601 cohort or similar. The scaled aims include:
AIM 1) To develop an optimal multiplexed predictive model that uses HER pathway related proteins, downstream signaling proteins and hetero- or homodimerization state of HER2.
This aim will use the quantitative multiplexing technology (called AQUA) for accurate in situ measurement of protein expression on a series of 10-25 HER2 pathway related proteins to construct a series of models that predict response to trastuzumab in the CALGB 9840 trial (A trial of taxol and trastuzumab in in the first line metastatic setting) AIM 2) To use Ilumina DASL-based Gene Expression Profiling to develop an optimal multiplexed predictive model.
This aim will assess gene expression using a custom gene set on the Illumina DASL custom array (1536 genes) Platform in the CALGB 9840 cohort to identify candidate predictors for the multiplexed predictive model. Specifically, candidate amplicons, and genes associated with these candidate amplicons, which are associated with response to trastuzumab will be identified for inclusion in the model.
AIM 3) To do computational modeling of the combined data from Aim I and 2 to discover the best 3-5 models that fit the training set (CALGB 9840) data.
This aim will create a series of optimal models that best select responders from non-responders in the CALGB training set. Validation of the models will be done by Leave One Out Cross Validation methods in anticipation of future more robust validation in an independent cohort in a subsequent study.

Public Health Relevance

Treatment of breast cancer with hormonal therapy and more recently trastuzumab (Herceptin) has led the field of cancer treatment in the use of companion diagnostics to select patients most likely to respond to targeted therapies. However, the currently used diagnostic tests are based on technologies that are 20-30 years old and thus lack accuracy and specificity due to their non-quantitative and unifocal nature. Here we propose the development of quantitative, multiplexed assays to more accurately define the patient subset that will benefit from trastuzumab.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01CA139431-02
Application #
7906816
Study Section
Cancer Biomarkers Study Section (CBSS)
Program Officer
Forry, Suzanne L
Project Start
2009-08-05
Project End
2012-07-31
Budget Start
2010-08-01
Budget End
2012-07-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$584,668
Indirect Cost
Name
Yale University
Department
Pathology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
043207562
City
New Haven
State
CT
Country
United States
Zip Code
06520
Wasserman, Brad E; Carvajal-Hausdorf, Daniel E; Ho, Kenneth et al. (2017) High concordance of a closed-system, RT-qPCR breast cancer assay for HER2 mRNA, compared to clinically determined immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and quantitative immunofluorescence. Lab Invest 97:1521-1526
Wimberly, Hallie; Brown, Jason R; Schalper, Kurt et al. (2015) PD-L1 Expression Correlates with Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 3:326-32
Carvajal-Hausdorf, Daniel E; Schalper, Kurt A; Neumeister, Veronique M et al. (2015) Quantitative measurement of cancer tissue biomarkers in the lab and in the clinic. Lab Invest 95:385-96
Carvajal-Hausdorf, Daniel E; Schalper, Kurt A; Pusztai, Lajos et al. (2015) Measurement of Domain-Specific HER2 (ERBB2) Expression May Classify Benefit From Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:
Cheng, Huan; Bai, Yalai; Sikov, William et al. (2014) Quantitative measurements of HER2 and phospho-HER2 expression: correlation with pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. BMC Cancer 14:326
Rimm, David; Schalper, Kurt; Pusztai, Lajos (2014) Unvalidated antibodies and misleading results. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147:457-8
Baquero, Maria T; Hanna, Jason A; Neumeister, Veronique et al. (2012) Stathmin expression and its relationship to microtubule-associated protein tau and outcome in breast cancer. Cancer 118:4660-9
Bordeaux, Jennifer; Welsh, Allison; Agarwal, Seema et al. (2010) Antibody validation. Biotechniques 48:197-209