Despite the growing use of breast conservation as primary therapy for breast cancer, mastectomy remains a common treatment option. Many patients choose to undergo breast reconstruction as an effective means of lessening the adverse impact of mastectomy on psychosocial functioning. Despite these benefits, well-designed studies comparing the current choices from the patient's point of view are difficult (if not impossible) to come by. Previous research on breast reconstruction outcomes has also failed to include race as an important variable. In order to actively participate in the reconstruction decision making process, breast cancer survivors need objective, up-to- date information on breast reconstruction outcomes from the patient's perspective. The proposed Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study will use a prospective cohort design to compare outcomes for the five commonly used options for breast reconstruction: expander/implant, latissimus dorsi/implant, pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), free TRAM, and deep inferior epigastric perforator techniques. Outcomes assessed will include complications, postoperative pain, psychosocial well-being, physical functioning, patient satisfaction and costs. The project will also evaluate the effects of race and ethnicity on reconstruction outcomes. Nine leading centers in the United States will participate. Together, these institutions perform over 2700 breast reconstructions annually. The five year study will evaluate patients preoperatively and at one week, three months, one year and two years following reconstruction. For data sources, the project will rely on medical and billing records, as well as a panel of generic and condition-specific patient-report outcome measures. The MROC Study will benefit a variety of stakeholders in the healthcare marketplace: The project will provide consumers, providers, payers, and policy-makers with reliable, up-to-date information on the effectiveness and relative costs of surgical options for breast reconstruction, thereby promoting a more evidence-based approach to treatment and policy decision-making. Study findings will also assist health care organizations in designing systems of care tailored to the specific needs and preferences of diverse patient populations.
The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study will bring together nine leading centers in the United States to compare the outcomes of common techniques for breast reconstruction. Implant and natural tissue techniques will be compared using a variety of measures, including complication rates and costs. Most importantly, these options will be assessed using data from patient surveys that ask about post-operative pain, quality of life, body image, sexuality, physical functioning, and patient satisfaction, the outcomes that matter most to women. To track the long-term results of these operations, this five year study will follow patients for two years after their reconstructions. The effects of race and ethnicity on breast reconstruction outcomes will also be studied. Findings from the MROC study will assist patients, surgeons, payers and policy makers in identifying the most effective surgical options for women seeking reconstruction after mastectomy. Study results will also help design reconstruction services which better meet the needs and preferences of diverse patient populations.
|Erdmann-Sager, Jessica; Wilkins, Edwin G; Pusic, Andrea L et al. (2018) Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:271-281|
|Yoon, Alfred P; Qi, Ji; Brown, David L et al. (2018) Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast 37:72-79|
|Wilkins, Edwin G; Hamill, Jennifer B; Kim, Hyungjin M et al. (2018) Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: One-year Outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study. Ann Surg 267:164-170|
|Berlin, Nicholas L; Hamill, Jennifer B; Qi, Ji et al. (2018) Nonresponse bias in survey research: lessons from a prospective study of breast reconstruction. J Surg Res 224:112-120|
|Jagsi, Reshma; Momoh, Adeyiza O; Qi, Ji et al. (2018) Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction. J Natl Cancer Inst 110:|
|Clemens, Mark W (2018) Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Reconstruction: 2-Year Risks and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Study: Correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:532|
|Roth, Randy S; Qi, Ji; Hamill, Jennifer B et al. (2018) Is chronic postsurgical pain surgery-induced? A study of persistent postoperative pain following breast reconstruction. Breast 37:119-125|
|Berlin, Nicholas L; Momoh, Adeyiza O; Qi, Ji et al. (2017) Racial and ethnic variations in one-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 214:312-317|
|Momoh, Adeyiza O; Cohen, Wess A; Kidwell, Kelley M et al. (2017) Tradeoffs Associated With Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women Choosing Breast Reconstruction: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Cohort. Ann Surg 266:158-164|
|Srinivasa, Dhivya R; Garvey, Patrick B; Qi, Ji et al. (2017) Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Tissue Expander/Implant Reconstruction: 2-Year Risks and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:869-877|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 28 publications