ETS family protein alterations (primarily ERG translocations) are present in >50% of human prostate cancers in Western men. We were the first to develop a robust GEM model of ERG-driven prostate cancer, revealing enhanced luminal differentiation and an expanded androgen receptor (AR) cistrome in tumors, suggesting a novel mechanism for ERG oncogenicity via chromatin programming (Chen, 2013). We and others subsequently established that ERG activates a luminal differentiation program in prostate organoids, human prostate cell lines and, by computational analysis of prostate cancer genomes, in clinical samples (Blee et al., 2018; Kron et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020b). Other ETS gain-of-function alterations e.g. ETV4 translocations (Li et al., 2020a) and ETS loss-of-function alterations e.g. ERF repressor mutations/deletions (Bose et al., 2017) also show this phenotype, as does FOXA1 (also amplified or mutated in prostate cancer) but with a contracted AR cistrome (Adams et al., 2019). Having demonstrated that luminal differentiation is a primary feature of multiple oncogenic ETS proteins (and FOXA1), our major goal during the next funding cycle is to understand how ERG activates this differentiation program and how this program results in an oncogenic phenotype. We will pursue three parallel lines of investigation. First, from our biochemical studies using purified full-length proteins and various DNA templates, we find that that ERG (and other ETS factors) cooperatively enhance AR DNA binding through allosteric effects via direct protein-protein interaction; biologically, this broadens the AR cistrome to include novel AR binding sites (Wasmuth et al., 2020).
Aim 1 will expand this analysis to assess the role of FOXA1 on AR/ERG interactions. Second, we have built genetically defined prostate organoid models that recapitulate the luminal differentiation effect of ERG within a precisely defined time course. Using this system, we identified epigenetic changes that silence transcription of the basal epithelial master regulator p63, likely explaining the reduction in basal cells.
Aim 2 will use lineage tracing, single cell analysis, and CRISPR screening to further elucidate how ERG expands the number of luminal cells and initiates oncogenic transformation. Third, we showed that another oncogenic ETS protein (ETV4) also drives luminal differentiation and is sufficient, alone, to initiate prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Remarkably, these luminal epithelial cells acquire exquisite dependence on AR for survival (in contrast to normal luminal epithelial cells) and consequently display enhanced sensitivity to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
Aim 3 will explore mechanisms underlying this shift to cell-intrinsic AR dependence by examining changes in the AR cistrome and transcriptome following luminal-specific AR ablation (by genetic deletion) versus systemic androgen deprivation through surgical castration (impairs AR function in prostate stroma and epithelium). We will complement these experiments with single cell analysis of ETS-positive patient samples before and after ADT.

Public Health Relevance

A hallmark of prostate cancer is enhanced androgen receptor (AR) activity. A mechanism by which AR mis- regulation is thought to occur is through acquisition of new binding sites throughout the genome that shift the transcriptional program from differentiation to proliferation. In this proposal, we investigate how mutations in ETS factors, clinically important oncogenic drivers of prostate cancer, promote luminal cell identity and regulate chromatin architecture of cancerous prostate tissues, including by co-option of AR function.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Research Project (R01)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Cancer Molecular Pathobiology Study Section (CAMP)
Program Officer
Fingerman, Ian M
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
New York
United States
Zip Code
Abida, Wassim; Sawyers, Charles L (2018) Targeting DNA Repair in Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 36:1017-1019
Hieronymus, Haley; Murali, Rajmohan; Tin, Amy et al. (2018) Tumor copy number alteration burden is a pan-cancer prognostic factor associated with recurrence and death. Elife 7:
Shoag, Jonathan; Liu, Deli; Blattner, Mirjam et al. (2018) SPOP mutation drives prostate neoplasia without stabilizing oncogenic transcription factor ERG. J Clin Invest 128:381-386
Xie, Yuanyuan; Cao, Zhen; Wong, Elissa Wp et al. (2018) COP1/DET1/ETS axis regulates ERK transcriptome and sensitivity to MAPK inhibitors. J Clin Invest 128:1442-1457
Moore, Amanda R; Ran, Leili; Guan, Youxin et al. (2018) GNA11 Q209L Mouse Model Reveals RasGRP3 as an Essential Signaling Node in Uveal Melanoma. Cell Rep 22:2455-2468
Chen, Yu; Chi, Ping (2018) Basket trial of TRK inhibitors demonstrates efficacy in TRK fusion-positive cancers. J Hematol Oncol 11:78
Ran, Leili; Chen, Yuedan; Sher, Jessica et al. (2018) FOXF1 Defines the Core-Regulatory Circuitry in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. Cancer Discov 8:234-251
Shukla, Shipra; Cyrta, Joanna; Murphy, Devan A et al. (2017) Aberrant Activation of a Gastrointestinal Transcriptional Circuit in Prostate Cancer Mediates Castration Resistance. Cancer Cell 32:792-806.e7
Viswanathan, Vasanthi S; Ryan, Matthew J; Dhruv, Harshil D et al. (2017) Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway. Nature 547:453-457
Shah, Neel; Wang, Ping; Wongvipat, John et al. (2017) Regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor via a BET-dependent enhancer drives antiandrogen resistance in prostate cancer. Elife 6:

Showing the most recent 10 out of 32 publications