This project will evaluate the clinical efficacy of contingency management procedures that could feasibly be implemented in community methadone maintenance programs. Experiment 1 investigates take-home incentive procedures during methadone maintenance treatment. New maintenance enrollees (N=240) will be randomly assigned to: 1) a urinalysis contingency in which take-homes are based exclusively on drug-free urine test results, 2) an employment contingency in which take-homes are based entirely on employment and job-seeking activities, or 3) a noncontingent control in which take-home privileges are not influenced by patient performance. Drug use and employment outcomes will be examined for evidence of differential treatment effects. Experiment 2 will utilize 90 maintenance patients who demonstrated stable, drug-free performance during Experiment 1 and who agree to continue treatment while participating in an evaluation of contingent and noncontingent adjunct medication availability during gradual methadone detoxification. For subjects randomly assigned to the contingent intervention, Valrelease doses (up to 30 mg/day) will be available only if recent urine specimens have tested opiate-free. Subjects assigned to noncontingent interventions will be able to request adjunct medication (active Valrelease for some, placebo for others) independently of urine test results. Retention and drug use outcomes will be examined for evidence of differential treatment effects. Experiment 3 will utilize 75 subjects who habitually supplement their methadone with illicit opiate and/or nonopiate drugs during treatment. These patients will participate in an evaluation of two avoidance procedures that may effectively control supplemental drug use: 1) dose-loss avoidance in which drug-positive urine tests result in small dose reductions while drug-free urines can restore the original dose, and 2) treatment termination avoidance in which subjects must meet an average drug-free urine criterion during the evaluation period in order to continue in treatment. Control subjects will receive usual care with no explicit contingencies. Urinalysis test results will be examined for evidence of differential treatment efficacy. Overall, these studies will provide important information about the ability of contingency management interventions to promote improved treatment outcomes among methadone maintenance patients. The information gained may result in improved treatment delivery procedures for both methadone maintenance and detoxification patients.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DA004104-03
Application #
3209215
Study Section
(DAPB)
Project Start
1986-05-01
Project End
1990-04-30
Budget Start
1988-06-01
Budget End
1989-04-30
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
1988
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Johns Hopkins University
Department
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
045911138
City
Baltimore
State
MD
Country
United States
Zip Code
21218
Iguchi, M Y (1998) Drug abuse treatment as HIV prevention: changes in social drug use patterns might also reduce risk. J Addict Dis 17:9-18
Stitzer, M L; Iguchi, M Y; Kidorf, M et al. (1993) Contingency management in methadone treatment: the case for positive incentives. NIDA Res Monogr 137:19-36
Stitzer, M L; Iguchi, M Y; Felch, L J (1992) Contingent take-home incentive: effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 60:927-34
Stitzer, M L; Kirby, K C (1991) Reducing illicit drug use among methadone patients. NIDA Res Monogr 106:178-203
Iguchi, M Y; Stitzer, M L (1991) Predictors of opiate drug abuse during a 90-day methadone detoxification. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 17:279-94
Bickel, W K; Stitzer, M L; Bigelow, G E et al. (1988) Buprenorphine: dose-related blockade of opioid challenge effects in opioid dependent humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247:47-53
Iguchi, M Y; Stitzer, M L; Bigelow, G E et al. (1988) Contingency management in methadone maintenance: effects of reinforcing and aversive consequences on illicit polydrug use. Drug Alcohol Depend 22:1-7
Stitzer, M L; Bickel, W K; Bigelow, G E (1987) Altered dose incentive procedures: effects on polydrug use among methadone maintenance patients. NIDA Res Monogr 76:162-7
Stitzer, M L; Bickel, W K; Bigelow, G E et al. (1986) Effect of methadone dose contingencies on urinalysis test results of polydrug-abusing methadone-maintenance patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 18:341-8