Despite the well-documented health disparities faced by minority youth, the field of substance abuse treatment has only addressed the most elementary questions regarding the effectiveness of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) with minority youth. Similarly, randomized controlled trials testing EBTs for substance-abusing youth are dominated (numerically speaking) by males. While several recent reviews have indicated that a number of EBTs are effective with substance abusing, juvenile justice-involved, ethnic minority, adolescent populations, many important questions remain unanswered. Fundamentally, the question of whether standard EBTs are equally beneficial for ethnic minority and European American, as well as male and female, youth remains unanswered because most studies lack adequate statistical power to detect moderator effects (ethnicity by treatment interaction). Further, we know even less about how EBTs achieve their effects among girls and minority populations-largely because researchers have only begun using sophisticated methods to examine mediators of treatment effects irrespective of gender/ethnicity-and have not begun to address whether different treatment mechanisms operate in different ethnicities and genders. Curran et al. (2008) introduced a promising method for integrating data from numerous longitudinal studies, even when the observed outcome measures for a construct vary across studies, Integrative Data Analysis (IDA). We propose to use IDA methods to link measures of substance use, delinquency, and family functioning from 10 longitudinal randomized controlled trials testing the effectiveness of Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT), an empirically-supported treatment for substance abusing, juvenile-justice- involved youth (Liddle, 2009) and address the following specific aims:
Aim 1 : Intervention Effectiveness - To compare the clinical outcomes of MDFT to those achieved by comparison treatments across 10 randomized controlled trials.
Aim 2 : Moderating Effects - To examine the extent to which ethnicity and gender moderate intervention outcomes.
Aim 3 : Mechanisms of Action - To identify the mechanisms through which MDFT achieves its effects in male and female youth from diverse ethnic backgrounds. Measures of substance use, delinquency, and family functioning from a total of 1532 youth collected across 10 RCTs will be analyzed. State-of-the-art statistical techniques, including latent growth curve modeling (LGM) and mediation tests using the asymptotic bootstrap confidence interval method, will be used to examine study hypotheses.

Public Health Relevance

The proposed study uses an innovative data analytic methodology, Integrative Data Analysis (IDA;Curran et al., 2008), to combine data from 10 randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT) as an evidence-based treatment for adolescent substance abuse and delinquency. Although MDFT developers have been concerned with gender and cultural issues as they pertain to treatment effectiveness (Dakof, 2000;Jackson-Gilfort et al., 2001;Rodriguez et al., 2007), previous single-study MDFT trials have been limited in the statistical power they have to test meaningful research questions regarding MDFT's comparative effectiveness with minority and White, non-Latino, as well as male and female, youth. The study has the potential to yield new knowledge about MDFTs effectiveness with female and ethnic minority youth and extend IDA methodology for clinical research.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Research Project (R01)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Risk, Prevention and Intervention for Addictions Study Section (RPIA)
Program Officer
Jones, Dionne
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Sam Houston State University
Schools of Arts and Sciences
United States
Zip Code
Greenbaum, Paul E; Wang, Wei; Henderson, Craig E et al. (2015) Gender and ethnicity as moderators: Integrative data analysis of multidimensional family therapy randomized clinical trials. J Fam Psychol 29:919-30