Making decisions efficiently is the process of weighing costs and benefits. And while enormous progress has been made in the last two decades towards understanding the neural mechanisms by which humans and monkeys weigh benefits, much less is known about how the brains of these species weigh costs. There is, however, growing evidence from both humans and monkeys indicating that costs and benefits may be encoded by distinct neural systems and integrated quite late in the decision cascade. Here we propose a set of simple experiments designed to orthogonalize costs and benefits during human and monkey decision-making while we measure - and manipulate - neural activity in a suite of decision-related areas. Our goal is to test the hypothesis that separate anterior areas (mostly in the frontal cortex) maintain separate representations of costs and benefits, representations that are subsequently integrated for choice (in oculomotor tasks) in what are often called the fronto-parietal choice circuits. To test this hypothesis we propose a complementary set of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) experiments in humans and single unit recording and muscimol inactivation experiments in monkeys. The fMRI experiments allow for a large-scale whole-brain test of our hypothesis. The single unit studies allow a rigorous quantitative measurement of the degree of cost and benefit representation in each area and the ability to establish a causal for some or all of these areas in cost benefit integration.

Public Health Relevance

Making decisions efficiently is the process of weighing costs and benefits. We propose a set of simple experiments designed to orthogonalize costs and benefits during human and monkey decision-making while we measure - and manipulate neural activity. Our goal is to test the hypothesis that distinct representations of costs and benefits interact to guide choice in an understandable manner.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DA038063-02
Application #
8926932
Study Section
Cognition and Perception Study Section (CP)
Program Officer
Volman, Susan
Project Start
2014-09-15
Project End
2019-08-31
Budget Start
2015-09-01
Budget End
2016-08-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2015
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
New York University
Department
Neurology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
041968306
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10012
Konova, Anna B; Louie, Kenway; Glimcher, Paul W (2018) The computational form of craving is a selective multiplication of economic value. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:4122-4127
Zimmermann, Jan; Glimcher, Paul W; Louie, Kenway (2018) Multiple timescales of normalized value coding underlie adaptive choice behavior. Nat Commun 9:3206
Lopez-Guzman, Silvia; Konova, Anna B; Louie, Kenway et al. (2018) Risk preferences impose a hidden distortion on measures of choice impulsivity. PLoS One 13:e0191357
Yamada, Hiroshi; Louie, Kenway; Tymula, Agnieszka et al. (2018) Free choice shapes normalized value signals in medial orbitofrontal cortex. Nat Commun 9:162
Chung, Hui-Kuan; Tymula, Agnieszka; Glimcher, Paul (2017) The Reduction of Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Gray Matter Volume Correlates with Loss of Economic Rationality in Aging. J Neurosci 37:12068-12077
Sepúlveda, Maria; Fernández-Diez, Begoña; Martínez-Lapiscina, Elena H et al. (2017) Impairment of decision-making in multiple sclerosis: A neuroeconomic approach. Mult Scler 23:1762-1771
Zimmermann, Jan; Vazquez, Yuriria; Glimcher, Paul W et al. (2016) Oculomatic: High speed, reliable, and accurate open-source eye tracking for humans and non-human primates. J Neurosci Methods 270:138-146
Louie, Kenway; Glimcher, Paul W; Webb, Ryan (2015) Adaptive neural coding: from biological to behavioral decision-making. Curr Opin Behav Sci 5:91-99