The goal of this research is to increase the effectiveness of hearing aids for older adults. Despite substantial improvements in hearing aid technology, the hearing aid take-up rate and the satisfaction with fitted hearing aids has not improved in the last decade. This is partly due to a failure by the research community to produce and disseminate updated fitting methods that facilitate the ability of practitioners to exploit insights derived from basic research. The two experiments in this proposal address this issue. These experiments will produce evidence-based recommendations about amplification needs that will assist clinicians to utilize new knowledge to capitalize on the potential of existing new technologies. ? ? The first experiment explores application of laboratory research on effectiveness of high frequency gain in real-world hearing aid fittings. Recent studies have suggested that, for some individuals with high frequency hearing loss, high frequency amplification is actually detrimental for speech understanding. There is a need to verify these observations in real world settings and to devise a practical method to validly identify patients for whom high-frequency gain is contraindicated. The study assesses the prevalence of such patients, and evaluates two new procedures that have been developed to prospectively select these individuals. The two procedures are used to identify experimental and control groups comprising 20 pairs of subjects. Each subject is fitted with a hearing aid that allows comparison of two amounts of high-frequency gain. Subjects undergo laboratory testing and a field trial to determine which high-frequency gain prescription is better. Results show the extent of the problem, and whether either of the two new procedures yields accurate prediction of optimal high-frequency gain. ? ? The second experiment explores the indications for bilateral (binaural) hearing aid fittings for older adults with bilateral hearing loss. Post-fit usage patterns and self-reports indicate that about 20-30% of bilaterally fitted individuals actually benefit more from one hearing aid than two. It is not clear why some patients prefer one hearing aid over two, or which patients will fall into this category. In this study, logistic regression is used to develop a model in which binaural summation, binaural integration, binaural interference, and attitudes towards hearing aids and hearing loss are combined to predict which individuals will ultimately benefit more from one hearing aid than two. For these individuals, resources presently allocated to hearing aid purchase would be used more effectively for alternate rehabilitation methods. Outcomes of 100 bilateral hearing aid fittings will be evaluated. ? ?

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01DC006222-01A1
Application #
6772242
Study Section
Auditory System Study Section (AUD)
Program Officer
Luethke, Lynn E
Project Start
2004-04-01
Project End
2008-02-28
Budget Start
2004-04-01
Budget End
2005-02-28
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2004
Total Cost
$280,183
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Memphis
Department
Type
Other Domestic Higher Education
DUNS #
055688857
City
Memphis
State
TN
Country
United States
Zip Code
38152
Johnson, Jani A; Xu, Jingjing; Cox, Robyn M (2017) Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization. Ear Hear 38:746-759
Cox, Robyn M; Alexander, Genevieve C; Xu, Jingjing (2014) Development of the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) scale. J Am Acad Audiol 25:727-36
Cox, Robyn M; Johnson, Jani A; Alexander, Genevieve C (2012) Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss. Ear Hear 33:573-87
Cox, Robyn M; Alexander, Genevieve C; Johnson, Jani et al. (2011) Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues. Ear Hear 32:339-48
Cox, Robyn M; Schwartz, Kathryn S; Noe, Colleen M et al. (2011) Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients. Ear Hear 32:181-97
Johnson, Jani A; Cox, Robyn M; Alexander, Genevieve C (2010) Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms. Ear Hear 31:47-55