Current methods for measuring dietary intake in free-living people typically result in an average under-estimation of energy intake (EI) of 10-50%. Data are suggestive, but not conclusive, that EI underreporting is specific to foods and beverages high in energy density (i.e., high in sugar and/or fat). Our work and that of others has shown that dietary misreporting, that is, underreporting or overreporting, may result in spurious statistical associations of dietary variables with body mass index (BMI) and chronic disease risk factors, which in turn may lead to incorrect conclusions about potential dietary contributors to overeating, obesity, and other health outcomes. Biomarkers that serve as objective, independent measures of dietary variables thought to be commonly and selectively misreported would help to verify which specific dietary factors are misreported by which individuals. In this response to PAR-07-259, Improving Diet and Physical Activity Assessment, our overall hypothesis is that dietary misreporting is specific to certain types of foods and/or nutrients;in particular, foods high in sugar and/or fat are underreported, and fruits and vegetables are overreported. We will recruit n=181 ethnically diverse men and women aged 18-65 y and BMI 18.5-45 kg/m2 primarily from the Healthy Purdue population--a university-based healthy lifestyle program with >9000 participants--but also from other sources. We will test our hypotheses by assessing a combination of novel (urinary sucrose + fructose for foods high in sugar) and established (plasma carotenoids and serum phylloquinone for fruits and vegetables) dietary biomarkers, reported dietary intakes, and their relationships with each other as well as with health outcomes in the total study sample (n=181) compared to the subsample of physiologically plausible EI reporters (target ne120;where, according to previously-established methodology, an individual's EI will be regarded as plausible if it is within ?1 SD of total energy expenditure measured by doubly labeled water). We expect the results of this study improve our understanding of the nature of reporting error in dietary assessment methodology, and ultimately help clarify relationships between different components of dietary intake and health outcomes.

Public Health Relevance

Two-thirds of the US population is overweight or obese, and therefore at risk for associated chronic diseases including diabetes, heart disease, or certain types of cancer. Determining the relative importance of proposed dietary contributors to these conditions is difficult because people's self-report of what, how much, and how often they consume certain types of foods is often inaccurate. Our proposal to measure objective biological indictors of dietary intake should improve dietary assessment results and lead to greater knowledge about specific dietary contributors to weight gain.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01DK075862-01A2
Application #
7657114
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-HOP-D (50))
Program Officer
Miles, Carolyn
Project Start
2009-09-30
Project End
2011-07-31
Budget Start
2009-09-30
Budget End
2010-07-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2009
Total Cost
$547,592
Indirect Cost
Name
Purdue University
Department
Nutrition
Type
Other Domestic Higher Education
DUNS #
072051394
City
West Lafayette
State
IN
Country
United States
Zip Code
47907
Martin, A A; Davidson, T L; McCrory, M A (2018) Deficits in episodic memory are related to uncontrolled eating in a sample of healthy adults. Appetite 124:33-42
Sharma, Rashmi S; Joy, Raechel C; Boushey, Carol J et al. (2014) Effects of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) form and administration mode on PABA recovery in 24-hour urine collections. J Acad Nutr Diet 114:457-63