This project introduces a novel strategy for bioavailability determination of sediment-borne contaminants featuring a wide range of chemical structures, properties and physical-chemical behaviors. The project addresses the pressing need of Superfund stakeholders to determine in a convenient and reliable fashion both human health risks from contaminated sediments and the effectiveness of implemented remediation strategies. The in situ sampling/bioavailability determination (IS2B) tool is a novel, patent-pending device enabling simultaneous determination of contaminant levels in bulk water and pore water at hitherto unattainably low method detection limits (MDLs). When deployed, one half of the tubular IS2B device is buried in sediment and the other is exposed to bulk water. Integrated multi-channel pumps simultaneously draw bulk water and sediment pore water into the active sampling device and push it at, respectively, high and low desirable flow rates through an array of filters and adsorption media. Water samples either can be stored in the device or expelled into the bulk water at will. Due to unlimited access to pore and bulk water during deployment, the IS2B tool provides ultra-low MDLs for a broad spectrum of contaminants, ranging from fully water-soluble to highly sorptive and hydrophobic. This functionality distinguishes the device from presently available passive sampling strategies. Know-how from three previous SRP projects is being leveraged to test the working hypothesis that the IS2B technology can serve to reliably (i) sample bulk and pore water pollutants for analysis in the sub-ng/L range, (ii) inform on the bioavailability and bioactivity of sediment contaminants, (iii) inform on human exposures and associated health risks from fish consumption, and (iv) track the progress of sediment remediation activities. Laboratory and field studies will be conducted with contaminated sediments from Lake Apopka, home to one of Florida's various Superfund sites. To illustrate the breadth of IS2B applicability, this project concentrates on two traditional and three emerging sediment contaminants (p,p'-DDE, dieldrin versus fipronil, triclosan, triclocarban). Because there may be discrepancies between the bioaccumulation predicted via modeling from sampler data and actual bioaccumulation, bioavailability and bioaccumulation of pollutants will be assessed in lab experiments with freshly spiked and long-term aged contaminated sediments via determination of body burdens in two test organisms: Lumbriculus variegatus and Pimephales promelas. Biological responses to contaminant exposure will also be measured in fish using DNA microarray analysis to evaluate effects that may not be predicted solely based on body burden of parent compounds. Mathematical relationships between pollutant concentrations in bulk water, pore water, worms and fish will be formulated from theory and lab data, and applied to IS2B-derived data to predict risk and track the effectiveness of two remediation approaches, granular activated carbon (GAC) amendment and deep tilling of contaminated sediment.

Public Health Relevance

This research project addresses the pressing need for better monitoring of toxicant bioavailability in contaminanted sediments by introducing the in situ sampling/bioavailability determination (IS2B) approach. The proposed device and mathematical model will inform risk assessment for environmental management for Superfund and other hazardous waste sites.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01ES020889-03
Application #
8514608
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZES1-SET-D (SF))
Program Officer
Henry, Heather F
Project Start
2011-09-20
Project End
2014-07-31
Budget Start
2013-08-01
Budget End
2014-07-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$271,292
Indirect Cost
$34,677
Name
Arizona State University-Tempe Campus
Department
Miscellaneous
Type
Organized Research Units
DUNS #
943360412
City
Tempe
State
AZ
Country
United States
Zip Code
85287
Magee, Hansa Y; Maurer, Megan M; Cobos, April et al. (2018) U.S. nationwide reconnaissance of ten infrequently monitored antibiotics in municipal biosolids. Sci Total Environ 643:460-467
Dang, Viet D; Kroll, Kevin J; Supowit, Samuel D et al. (2018) Activated carbon as a means of limiting bioaccumulation of organochlorine pesticides, triclosan, triclocarban, and fipronil from sediments rich in organic matter. Chemosphere 197:627-633
Halden, Rolf U; Lindeman, Avery E; Aiello, Allison E et al. (2017) The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban. Environ Health Perspect 125:064501
Chen, Jing; Pycke, Benny F G; Brownawell, Bruce J et al. (2017) Occurrence, temporal variation, and estrogenic burden of five parabens in sewage sludge collected across the United States. Sci Total Environ 593-594:368-374
Sadaria, Akash M; Sutton, Rebecca; Moran, Kelly D et al. (2017) Passage of fiproles and imidacloprid from urban pest control uses through wastewater treatment plants in northern California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:1473-1482
Driver, Erin M; Roberts, Jeff; Dollar, Peter et al. (2017) Comparative meta-analysis and experimental kinetic investigation of column and batch bottle microcosm treatability studies informing in situ groundwater remedial design. J Hazard Mater 323:377-385
Geer, Laura A; Pycke, Benny F G; Waxenbaum, Joshua et al. (2017) Association of birth outcomes with fetal exposure to parabens, triclosan and triclocarban in an immigrant population in Brooklyn, New York. J Hazard Mater 323:177-183
Halden, Rolf U (2016) Lessons Learned from Probing for Impacts of Triclosan and Triclocarban on Human Microbiomes. mSphere 1:
Dang, Viet D; Kroll, Kevin J; Supowit, Samuel D et al. (2016) Tissue distribution of organochlorine pesticides in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) from laboratory exposure and a contaminated lake. Environ Pollut 216:877-883
Supowit, Samuel D; Sadaria, Akash M; Reyes, Edward J et al. (2016) Mass Balance of Fipronil and Total Toxicity of Fipronil-Related Compounds in Process Streams during Conventional Wastewater and Wetland Treatment. Environ Sci Technol 50:1519-26

Showing the most recent 10 out of 37 publications