Successful mitosis requires the equal segregation of the genome from mother to daughter cells. This occurs on the mitotic spindle, an intracellular machine that uses microtubules (MTs) and MT-based motor proteins to coordinate chromosome movements with cell division. The goal of our proposed studies is to elucidate the motor-mechanisms that position chromosomes on the spindle. Our central hypothesis is that this involves the cooperative activity of multiple motors functioning simultaneously to generate a dynamic balance of complementary and antagonistic forces. Specifically, motors positioned on kinetochores generate forces directed toward the spindle poles while motors positioned on chromosome arms generate forces directed toward the metaphase plate. We posit that when these 'poleward' and 'plateward' forces precisely balance, a steady-state structure forms and chromosomes maintain a stable position, as during metaphase. Tipping this balance, via the up- or down-regulation of a subset of motors, results in specific chromosome movements such as chromatid-to-pole motion during anaphase A. To study this, we will carry out the following specific aims using Drosophila early embryos as our primary experimental system:
Aim 1) Characterize the rates and structural basis of chromosome motility with high spatial and temporal resolution.
Aim 2) Test the hypothesis that the kinetochore binding motors, dynein/dynactin and KinI kinesins, work cooperatively to generate poleward forces on chromosomes.
Aim 3) Test the hypothesis that the chromosome-arm binding motors, KLP38B and Nod, work cooperatively to generate plateward forces on chromosomes.
Aim 4) Examine the functional inter-relationships that exist between sets of poleward and plateward motors to determine whether chromosomes are subjected to counterbalancing motor-generated forces. Our overall experimental strategy is to utilize the results of analyses of individual motors to formulate and test broader hypotheses regarding how these motors work collectively to drive the coherent and tightly controlled reorganization of the genome that must occur during cell proliferation. Because defects in this process lead to numerous human maladies, including birth defects and cancer, our findings should provide insights into the causes of these diseases and suggest potential therapeutic approaches to their treatment.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM065940-02
Application #
6644128
Study Section
Cell Development and Function Integrated Review Group (CDF)
Program Officer
Deatherage, James F
Project Start
2002-08-15
Project End
2007-07-31
Budget Start
2003-08-01
Budget End
2004-07-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2003
Total Cost
$258,850
Indirect Cost
Name
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Department
Physiology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
071036636
City
Bronx
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10461
Sharp, David J; Ross, Jennifer L (2012) Microtubule-severing enzymes at the cutting edge. J Cell Sci 125:2561-9
Mukherjee, Suranjana; Diaz Valencia, J Daniel; Stewman, Shannon et al. (2012) Human Fidgetin is a microtubule severing the enzyme and minus-end depolymerase that regulates mitosis. Cell Cycle 11:2359-66
Zhang, Dong; Grode, Kyle D; Stewman, Shannon F et al. (2011) Drosophila katanin is a microtubule depolymerase that regulates cortical-microtubule plus-end interactions and cell migration. Nat Cell Biol 13:361-70
Mennella, Vito; Tan, Dong-Yan; Buster, Daniel W et al. (2009) Motor domain phosphorylation and regulation of the Drosophila kinesin 13, KLP10A. J Cell Biol 186:481-90
Wainman, Alan; Buster, Daniel W; Duncan, Tommy et al. (2009) A new Augmin subunit, Msd1, demonstrates the importance of mitotic spindle-templated microtubule nucleation in the absence of functioning centrosomes. Genes Dev 23:1876-81
Zhang, Dong; Rogers, Gregory C; Buster, Daniel W et al. (2007) Three microtubule severing enzymes contribute to the ""Pacman-flux"" machinery that moves chromosomes. J Cell Biol 177:231-42