One of our long-term goals is to understand how base excision repair (BER) maintains genetic integrity and functions in epigenetic regulation. This project aims to reveal how DNA glycosylases, which initiate BER, recognize and remove deaminated or oxidized forms of 5-methylcytosine (mC) from DNA, and how their activity is regulated by post-translational modification. As the most abundant modified base in DNA, mC serves as an epigenetic mark for gene silencing in eukaryotes and functions in the restriction modification systems of archaea and bacteria. However, cytosine methylation also poses a serious threat to genetic and epigenetic integrity. Deamination of mC to T generates G/T mispairs, and, upon replication, C to T transitions. Through this process mC deamination causes a large fraction of point mutations in cancer and genetic disease, which highlights the need to understand how glycosylases recognize and process G/T mispairs. Three types of glycosylases initiate repair of G/T mispairs: TDG (thymine DNA glycosylase), MBD4 (methyl binding domain IV), and MIG (mismatch glycosylase). While most glycosylases remove bases that are foreign to DNA (e.g., uracil), these mismatch enzymes remove thymine from rare G/T mispairs but not from the huge background of A:T pairs in DNA. Because aberrant glycosylase action on undamaged DNA is mutagenic and cytotoxic, the specificity of these enzymes is critical, but it remains poorly understood. The current paradigm holds that mismatch specificity derives from enzyme contacts with the mismatched guanine, but this remains unsubstantiated. Using a synergistic combination of experimental and computational methods, we will test this model and investigate three other potential specificity factors, defining the mechanism of G/T mismatch specificity for MBD4, MIG, and TDG. Recent studies show that TET enzymes oxidize mC, to 5-hydroxymethyl- C (hmC), 5-formyl-C (fC), and 5-carboxyl-C (caC), and that TDG excision of fC (or caC) and follow-on BER completes a TET-TDG-BER pathway for DNA demethylation. This key function in epigenetic regulation likely explains the essentiality of TDG for embryogenesis. However, the molecular basis of this recently discovered activity is poorly defined. New high-resolution crystal structures will reveal how TDG recognizes fC and caC in DNA. We will also investigate the molecular basis of new findings that TDG exhibits a vast difference in base- pairing preferences for excision of fC and caC relative to T (and other uracils), and investigate the capacity of TDG and BER to process proximal fC or caC bases in opposite strands without generating proximal AP sites or double-strand breaks. TDG is subject to SUMO modification and it has a SUMO-interacting motif (SIM) that binds non-covalently to SUMO domains. Mechanisms that regulate levels of SUMO~TDG in cells are poorly understood. The proposed studies will reveal isopeptidases that regulate TDG, and define their specificity and efficiency. A novel in vitro SUMO modification-deconjugation system will be used to directly test the current paradigm that sumoylation of TDG regulates product release and enhances enzymatic turnover.
This proposal seeks to elaborate how repair enzymes protect against DNA mutations caused by damage to 5- methylcytosine, an abundant modified base in DNA. A large percentage of point mutations in cancer and genetic disease are attributable to 5-methylcytosine deamination. The proposed studies will advance understanding of how repair enzymes counter this threat and why these mutations are nevertheless prevalent in human DNA. The studies will also advance understanding about how these enzymes contribute to regulating DNA methylation, which is important because aberrant DNA methylation is implicated in diseases including cancer and in ageing.
|Tarantino, Mary E; Dow, Blaine J; Drohat, Alexander C et al. (2018) Nucleosomes and the three glycosylases: High, medium, and low levels of excision by the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily. DNA Repair (Amst) 72:56-63|
|Coey, Christopher T; Drohat, Alexander C (2018) Defining the impact of sumoylation on substrate binding and catalysis by thymine DNA glycosylase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:5159-5170|
|Coey, Christopher T; Drohat, Alexander C (2017) Kinetic Methods for Studying DNA Glycosylases Functioning in Base Excision Repair. Methods Enzymol 592:357-376|
|Coey, Christopher T; Malik, Shuja S; Pidugu, Lakshmi S et al. (2016) Structural basis of damage recognition by thymine DNA glycosylase: Key roles for N-terminal residues. Nucleic Acids Res 44:10248-10258|
|Drohat, Alexander C; Coey, Christopher T (2016) Role of Base Excision ""Repair"" Enzymes in Erasing Epigenetic Marks from DNA. Chem Rev 116:12711-12729|
|McLaughlin, Dylan; Coey, Christopher T; Yang, Wei-Chih et al. (2016) Characterizing Requirements for Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) Modification and Binding on Base Excision Repair Activity of Thymine-DNA Glycosylase in Vivo. J Biol Chem 291:9014-24|
|Semlow, Daniel R; Zhang, Jieqiong; Budzowska, Magda et al. (2016) Replication-Dependent Unhooking of DNA Interstrand Cross-Links by the NEIL3 Glycosylase. Cell 167:498-511.e14|
|Pidugu, Lakshmi S; Flowers, Joshua W; Coey, Christopher T et al. (2016) Structural Basis for Excision of 5-Formylcytosine by Thymine DNA Glycosylase. Biochemistry 55:6205-6208|
|Bellacosa, Alfonso; Drohat, Alexander C (2015) Role of base excision repair in maintaining the genetic and epigenetic integrity of CpG sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 32:33-42|
|Buechner, Claudia N; Maiti, Atanu; Drohat, Alexander C et al. (2015) Lesion search and recognition by thymine DNA glycosylase revealed by single molecule imaging. Nucleic Acids Res 43:2716-29|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 32 publications