Although energy homeostasis is central in feeding behavior, the decision to eat is not merely a question of hunger. In a natural environment in which food is often scarce, evaluating the benefit of gaining food over the energy cost or risk in seeking and acquiring food, and the decision to either seek food or stay put and conserve energy is essential for survival. However, the genetic and molecular basis of food-seeking decision-making behaviors, and their functional significance in fitness are poorly understood. We propose a bottom-up approach: starting from well-defined behaviors that are essential for food-seeking decision-making in Drosophila, taking advantage of its rich genetic tools and genomic resources. Moreover, flies are ideal for viability studies to examine the relations between genetic variations, differences in decision- making and differences in fitness under different environmental conditions. We have already taken the critical step and designed novel assays. We will optimize the following assays for quantitative analysis in this application. Decision-making in choosing between 1) small free reward or large reward that requires work; 2) small reward or large reward with a relatively low probability in its availability; 3) small reward or large reward that is paired with potential risks of getting noxious food; and 4) immediate small reward or delayed large reward. We will take advantage of natural variation in genetics and behaviors between different D. melanogaster populations living in African. We will establish 200 recombinant inbred strains derived from original African strains with extreme behavioral phenotypes for each decision-making behavior. We will perform QTL mapping and identify QTLs that contribute to the variations in food-seeking decision-making and fitness. We will then use RNAi transgenic lines to identify specific genes and variants responsible for the above behavioral variations. Although the most likely immediate clinical relevance of our study is obesity, it will have a much broader impact on neuroeconomics, the genetic basis of behavior in general, evolution and ecology.
We propose to establish a reliable and efficient model system that can be used to systematically search for genes and molecular pathways involved in feeding behavior, obesity and their therapeutic targets.
|VanKuren, Nicholas W; Long, Manyuan (2018) Gene duplicates resolving sexual conflict rapidly evolved essential gametogenesis functions. Nat Ecol Evol 2:705-712|
|Lee, Yuh Chwen G; Yang, Qian; Chi, Wanhao et al. (2017) Genetic Architecture of Natural Variation Underlying Adult Foraging Behavior That Is Essential for Survival of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol Evol 9:1357-1369|
|Zhang, Wenyu; Landback, Patrick; Gschwend, Andrea R et al. (2015) New genes drive the evolution of gene interaction networks in the human and mouse genomes. Genome Biol 16:202|
|Gao, Ge; Vibranovski, Maria D; Zhang, Li et al. (2014) A long-term demasculinization of X-linked intergenic noncoding RNAs in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res 24:629-38|
|Zhang, Yong E; Long, Manyuan (2014) New genes contribute to genetic and phenotypic novelties in human evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 29:90-6|
|Chi, Wanhao; Zhang, Li; Du, Wei et al. (2014) A nutritional conditional lethal mutant due to pyridoxine 5'-phosphate oxidase deficiency in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (Bethesda) 4:1147-54|
|Chen, Sidi; Krinsky, Benjamin H; Long, Manyuan (2013) New genes as drivers of phenotypic evolution. Nat Rev Genet 14:645-60|
|Long, Manyuan; VanKuren, Nicholas W; Chen, Sidi et al. (2013) New gene evolution: little did we know. Annu Rev Genet 47:307-33|
|Beeler, Jeff A; Frazier, Cristianne R M; Zhuang, Xiaoxi (2012) Putting desire on a budget: dopamine and energy expenditure, reconciling reward and resources. Front Integr Neurosci 6:49|
|Zhang, Yong E; Landback, Patrick; Vibranovski, Maria et al. (2012) New genes expressed in human brains: implications for annotating evolving genomes. Bioessays 34:982-91|