More humans die in the intensive care unit from sepsis than from any other cause. Death from sepsis is the culmination of widespread hypoperfusion, cellular hypoxia, and multiple organ failure. A growing body of evidence shows that early therapeutic intervention improves outcomes for patients with sepsis. Novel targeted strategies that bolster a strong and durable systemic hemodynamic response have been proven to reduce or even reverse organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis. L-carnitine provides the key elements of a novel therapy to ameliorate the adverse hemodynamic effects of sepsis. Severe physiological stress forces energy metabolism to shift from primary fatty acid oxidation toward glycolysis and lactate oxidation. Prior work has shown that exogenous L-carnitine administration enhances glucose and lactate oxidation, attenuates fatty acid toxicity, and improves endothelial-smooth muscle coupling and cardiac mechanical efficiency. The overall goal of this proposal is to investigate L-carnitine as a novel adjunctive treatment of septic shock. In this study we will test our primary hypothesis: Early adjunctive L-carnitine administration in vasopressor dependent septic shock will significantly reduce cumulative organ failure at 48 hours with an associated decrease in 28-day mortality suggesting the need for further phase III study. To accomplish this we will conduct a phase II, double blinded, placebo controlled, adaptive randomized trial of 250 eligible patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock. Study subjects will be assigned to one of four arms: low (6g), medium (12g) or high (18g) dose intravenous L-carnitine or placebo for 12 hours as a part of early resuscitative care. Our first ai is to assess whether L-carnitine reduces cumulative organ failure in patients with septic shock. The first efficacy endpoint of the trial is reduction in cumulative organ failure, defined as a decrease in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at 48 hours after treatment. The SOFA data will be used to preferentially allocate subsequent patients to the L-carnitine dose that is most effective. As the trial progresses 28-day mortality data will be used to determine the probability that the dose of L-carnitine associated with the largest decrease in SOFA score would demonstrate efficacy in a subsequent phase III trial. By utilizing the strengths of an adaptive trial approach we can overcome several inefficiencies associated with traditional trials while maintaining protection against false positive results, and allow for dose finding, all while maintaining a manageable sample size.
Our second aim i s to assess if L-carnitine improves blood flow in the sublingual microvasculature during septic shock. We will use sidestream dark-field video-microscopy imaging of the sublingual microcirculation to directly visualize microcirculatory flow and to determine the effect of L-carnitine and placebo treatment on change in flow. Presently there are no treatments that are specific for targeting attenuation or reversal of organ dysfunction in sepsis. If this project shows benefit with L-carnitine, it will provide a useful, inexpensive, and widely applicable agent to the armamentarium of sepsis therapeutics.
The relevance of this project to public health lies in its potential ability to provide a novel, inexpensive and widely generalizable therapy for septic shock that is targeted at organ dysfunction. If proven useful, this therapy could hasten recovery from septic shock and result in saving thousands of lives per year from this deadly disease.
|Sterling, Sarah A; Puskarich, Michael A; Jones, Alan E (2018) The authors reply. Crit Care Med 46:e273-e274|
|Puskarich, Michael A; Evans, Charles R; Karnovsky, Alla et al. (2018) Septic Shock Nonsurvivors Have Persistently Elevated Acylcarnitines Following Carnitine Supplementation. Shock 49:412-419|
|Guirgis, Faheem W; Puskarich, Michael A; Smotherman, Carmen et al. (2017) Development of a Simple Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Risk Assessment of Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis. J Intensive Care Med :885066617741284|
|Javed, Adnan; Guirgis, Faheem W; Sterling, Sarah A et al. (2017) Clinical predictors of early death from sepsis. J Crit Care 42:30-34|
|Eckerle, Michelle; Ambroggio, Lilliam; Puskarich, Michael A et al. (2017) Metabolomics as a Driver in Advancing Precision Medicine in Sepsis. Pharmacotherapy 37:1023-1032|
|Sterling, Sarah A; Puskarich, Michael A; Glass, Andrew F et al. (2017) The Impact of the Sepsis-3 Septic Shock Definition on Previously Defined Septic Shock Patients. Crit Care Med 45:1436-1442|
|Puskarich, Michael A; Shapiro, Nathan I; Massey, Michael J et al. (2016) Lactate Clearance in Septic Shock Is Not a Surrogate for Improved Microcirculatory Flow. Acad Emerg Med 23:690-3|
|Reynolds, Joshua C; Grunau, Brian E; Rittenberger, Jon C et al. (2016) Association Between Duration of Resuscitation and Favorable Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Implications for Prolonging or Terminating Resuscitation. Circulation 134:2084-2094|
|Puskarich, Michael A; Kline, Jeffrey A; Watts, John A et al. (2016) Early alterations in platelet mitochondrial function are associated with survival and organ failure in patients with septic shock. J Crit Care 31:63-7|
|Sterling, Sarah A; Miller, W Ryan; Pryor, Jason et al. (2015) The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med 43:1907-15|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 15 publications