Syntactic flexibility refers to the fact that speakers can express most ideas with more than one syntactic structure. Such flexibility implies that the production system must choose which structure to use to express an idea, a process that is guided by two classes of factors. Information-processing factors, including accessibility (speakers use structures that mention accessible material earlier) and syntactic persistence (speakers use structures like those they have recently encountered), cause speakers to choose structures based on the cognitive or linguistic properties of the to-be-produced material. Communicative factors, including features of dialogue and discourse, cause speakers to select structures that facilitate information- transmission and coordination. These classes of factors are necessarily interrelated, as communicative influences must be exerted through the information-processing mechanisms that underlie syntactic production. The experiments proposed in Section I will use picture-naming and sentence-recall tasks situated in communicative settings to investigate the information-processing basis of sentence production by determining how accessibility and syntactic persistence effects are influenced by factors related to working memory, incrementality, lexical-syntactic interactions, and implicit learning. Specific theoretical questions that are addressed include how different working-memory constructs (storage, retrieval, executive functioning) influence sentence production, the scope of sentence planning, current accounts of the degree to which sentence planning is based on lexical versus lexical-plus-syntactic processing, and whether syntactic persistence reflects implicit learning or residual accessibility. The experiments proposed in Section II will extend this approach to investigate how accessibility and syntactic-persistence effects are influenced by communicative factors including discourse and dialogue structure and disfluency. The broad theoretical question addressed in Section II concerns the degree to which the influence of communicative factors reduces to the influences of production-motivated information-processing factors, versus being fundamental cognitive primitives that influence sentence production. The proposed research promises important new theoretical and practical insights. The cognitive mechanisms to be explored in the experiments form the basis both of psycholinguistic theory and language development. Better understanding of how such mechanisms lead to typical language production and communication will constrain and develop existing theory, as well as guide the development of approaches to diagnosing language and more general disorders and improving treatment. ? ? ?
| Blanco-Elorrieta, Esti; Ferreira, Victor S; Del Prato, Paul et al. (2018) The priming of basic combinatory responses in MEG. Cognition 170:49-63 |
| Kleinman, Daniel; Gollan, Tamar H (2018) Inhibition accumulates over time at multiple processing levels in bilingual language control. Cognition 173:115-132 |
| Ivanova, Iva; Wardlow, Liane; Warker, Jill et al. (2017) The effect of anomalous utterances on language production. Mem Cognit 45:308-319 |
| Ivanova, Iva; Branigan, Holly P; McLean, Janet F et al. (2017) Do you what I say? People reconstruct the syntax of anomalous utterances. Lang Cogn Neurosci 32:175-189 |
| Ivanova, Iva; Ferreira, Victor S; Gollan, Tamar H (2017) Form Overrides Meaning When Bilinguals Monitor for Errors. J Mem Lang 94:75-102 |
| Li, Chuchu; Goldrick, Matthew; Gollan, Tamar H (2017) Bilinguals' twisted tongues: Frequency lag or interference? Mem Cognit 45:600-610 |
| Kleinman, Daniel; Gollan, Tamar H (2016) Speaking Two Languages for the Price of One: Bypassing Language Control Mechanisms via Accessibility-Driven Switches. Psychol Sci 27:700-14 |
| Maxfield, Nathan D; Olsen, Wendy L; Kleinman, Daniel et al. (2016) Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter. Clin Neurophysiol 127:1942-60 |
| Kleinman, Daniel; Runnqvist, Elin; Ferreira, Victor S (2015) Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task. Cogn Psychol 79:68-101 |
| Hall, Matthew L; Ahn, Y Danbi; Mayberry, Rachel I et al. (2015) Production and comprehension show divergent constituent order preferences: Evidence from elicited pantomime. J Mem Lang 81:16-33 |
Showing the most recent 10 out of 55 publications
