Although arithmetic tutoring narrows the achievement gap between at-risk 1st graders and low-risk classmates on arithmetic problems, the gap for word-problem (WP) achievement steadily widens over the course of that tutoring. This is alarming because WP performance, an early form of complex mathematical reasoning, is the best long-term math predictor of employment and wages in adulthood and because scientific knowledge about early WP development lags behind arithmetic. The focus of this renewal is an innovative approach to preventing WP difficulty by embedding tutoring on language comprehension (LC), a cognitive resource associated with WPs, in the same academic material used to build WP skill. At-risk children are randomly assigned to 4 conditions. WP tutoring alone (the conventional, validated approach) is designed to compensate for limitations in working memory &reasoning. Embedded LC+WP tutoring (the innovative approach) is designed to strengthen LC while compensating for limitations in working memory &reasoning. Arithmetic tutoring is included to assess whether WP, arithmetic, &number knowledge learning is superior for either or both WP tutoring conditions compared to arithmetic tutoring. No tutoring is included to control for maturation and classroom instruction. At-risk children are followed through grade 3. Low-risk classmates are followed on the same measures at the same time points to assess achievement gaps.
Aim 1 is to assess the efficacy of embedded LC+WP tutoring for promoting WP, arithmetic, &number knowledge outcomes and for narrowing the achievement gap in these domains.
Aim 2 is to increase understanding about the role of LC, working memory, and reasoning in WP &arithmetic performance. This renewal has the potential to impact science by providing experimental evidence about the role of LC in WPs and insight into the process by which individual differences in LC, working memory, &reasoning interact with different forms of intervention on different math outcomes. The goal is to improve clinical practice by expanding the framework for preventing mathematics difficulty specifically and academic difficulty generally by assessing the added value of embedded cognitive resource training. If successful, we create the basis for scientific work on other forms of embedded cognitive resource training to extend the framework for academic intervention. This effort also provides a platform for transdisciplinary work across learning sciences, speech-language sciences, cognitive psychology, text comprehension, and learning disabilities. This transdisciplinary work is critical because current evidence indicates that LC difficulty negatively impacts response to academic intervention.
Mathematics disabilities are common and have major, negative impact on employment, social relationships, health, and quality of life. This research focuses on improving word-problem (WP) performance at 1st grade, because school-age WP performance is the best math predictor of employment and wages in adulthood;because scientific knowledge about early WP development lags behind calculations;and because the WP achievement gap widens dramatically for at-risk 1st graders even when they receive arithmetic tutoring.
|Bailey, Drew H; Fuchs, Lynn S; Gilbert, Jennifer K et al. (2018) Prevention: Necessary But Insufficient? A 2-Year Follow-Up of an Effective First-Grade Mathematics Intervention. Child Dev :|
|Powell, Sarah R; Fuchs, Lynn S (2018) Effective Word-Problem Instruction: Using Schemas to Facilitate Mathematical Reasoning. Teach Except Child 51:31-42|
|Fuchs, Lynn S; Gilbert, Jennifer K; Fuchs, Douglas et al. (2018) Text Comprehension and Oral Language as Predictors of Word-Problem Solving: Insights into Word-Problem Solving as a Form of Text Comprehension. Sci Stud Read 22:152-166|
|Gilbert, Jennifer K; Fuchs, Lynn S (2017) Bivariate Developmental Relations between Calculations and Word Problems: A Latent Change Approach. Contemp Educ Psychol 51:83-98|
|Powell, Sarah R; Cirino, Paul T; Malone, Amelia S (2017) Child-Level Predictors of Responsiveness to Evidence-Based Mathematics Intervention. Except Child 83:359-377|
|Price, Gavin R; Fuchs, Lynn S (2016) The Mediating Relation between Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Foundations of Math Competence. PLoS One 11:e0148981|
|Peng, Peng; Namkung, Jessica M; Fuchs, Douglas et al. (2016) A longitudinal study on predictors of early calculation development among young children at risk for learning difficulties. J Exp Child Psychol 152:221-241|
|Fuchs, Lynn S; Geary, David C; Fuchs, Douglas et al. (2016) Pathways to Third-Grade Calculation Versus Word-Reading Competence: Are They More Alike or Different? Child Dev 87:558-67|
|Fuchs, Lynn S; Gilbert, Jennifer K; Powell, Sarah R et al. (2016) The role of cognitive processes, foundational math skill, and calculation accuracy and fluency in word-problem solving versus prealgebraic knowledge. Dev Psychol 52:2085-2098|
|Iuculano, Teresa; Rosenberg-Lee, Miriam; Richardson, Jennifer et al. (2015) Cognitive tutoring induces widespread neuroplasticity and remediates brain function in children with mathematical learning disabilities. Nat Commun 6:8453|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 25 publications