Among women in the US, African Americans (AA) continue to be disproportionately affected by HIV, having the highest HIV incidence and HIV-related mortality. AA women are also disproportionately affected by forced sex, with 44% of AA women reporting rape by a partner, compared to 35% of White women. Forced sex contributes significantly to women's risk for HIV, directly when occurring with an HIV-infected partner and indirectly through participation in high risk behaviors. Neighborhood-level characteristics of the built and social environment (e.g., neighborhood disorder, poverty) have been studied as contributors to violence and HIV risk behaviors, but no studies have examined potentially modifiable environmental characteristics as contributors to forced sex specifically. Additionally, these neighborhood-level factors and forced sex experiences may result in physiological changes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis-based stress response for these women, in turn influencing their risk behaviors and STI infection. However, no study has examined the isolated effect of the stress-response resulting from a history of forced sex on HIV risk behaviors and STI infection, accounting for environmental factors.
The specific aims of the proposed project are to: 1) examine the association between features of the built and social environment (e.g., neighborhood disorder, norms about violence against women) and forced sex experiences and HIV risk factors;2) determine the physiological effect of a recent or chronic history of forced sex on the stress response within the HPA axis, represented by cortisol awakening response;and 3) assess whether features of the built and social environment and physiological factors moderate the relationship between forced sex and HIV risk factors. As our fourth aim, we will qualitatively provide context for 1) the built and social environment's role in increasing one's likelihood of experiencing forced sex and 2) a woman's perception of stress related to forced sex and its relationship to HIV risk behaviors. To this end, we will recruit 400 HIV-negative AA women at increased risk for HIV from low- income health clinics in inner-city Baltimore, MD into a retrospective cohort study. By study design, at least one-third of the sample will have experienced forced sex since the age of 18 and two-thirds will not have experienced any abuse. In Phase I, participants will complete a quantitative survey and biological data collection to measure salivary cortisol levels. In Phase II, a subset of women with a history of forced sex in adulthood (n=20) will participate in qualitative in-depth interviews. To our knowledge, the proposed study is the first to evaluate the independent and combined influence of environmental factors and physiological altered HPA-axis stress response that may contribute to increased vulnerability to HIV. Because the relationship between forced sex and HIV risk can be influenced by several potentially interconnected pathways, the long term goal of our work is to inform interventions that act on those pathways, and when combined together, will not only mitigate AA women's risk for HIV but also boost their level of resilience.
Forced sex contributes significantly to women's risk for HIV, yet the majority of research has focused on behavioral risk patterns without considering the influence of broader environmental factors and physiological changes that may influence the link between forced sex and HIV risk behaviors. Findings from the proposed research will be critical to the development, implementation, and evaluation of theoretically-driven HIV prevention interventions that consider the multilevel nature of HIV risk attributable to forced sex experiences. Further, given the disproportionate rates of HIV and concurrent increase in rates of sexual violence among African American women, these targeted multilevel HIV prevention interventions may provide maximal reductions in both forced sex and incident HIV infections for this at-risk population.
|Harvey, S Marie; Washburn, Isaac; Oakley, Lisa et al. (2017) Competing Priorities: Partner-Specific Relationship Characteristics and Motives for Condom Use Among At-Risk Young Adults. J Sex Res 54:665-676|
|Tsuyuki, Kiyomi; Donta, Balaiah; Dasgupta, Anindita et al. (2017) Masculine Gender Ideologies, Intimate Partner Violence, and Alcohol Use Increase Risk for Genital Tract Infections Among Men. J Interpers Violence :886260517700619|
|Tsuyuki, Kiyomi; Pitpitan, Eileen V; Levi-Minzi, Maria A et al. (2017) Substance Use Disorders, Violence, Mental Health, and HIV: Differentiating a Syndemic Factor by Gender and Sexuality. AIDS Behav 21:2270-2282|
|Gutzmer, Kyle; Ludwig-Barron, Natasha T; Wyatt, Gail E et al. (2016) ""Come on Baby. You Know I Love You"": African American Women's Experiences of Communication with Male Partners and Disclosure in the Context of Unwanted Sex. Arch Sex Behav 45:807-19|
|Watt, Melissa H; Kimani, Stephen M; Skinner, Donald et al. (2016) ""Nothing Is Free"": A Qualitative Study of Sex Trading Among Methamphetamine Users in Cape Town, South Africa. Arch Sex Behav 45:923-33|
|Ludwig-Barron, Natasha; Syvertsen, Jennifer L; Lagare, Tiffany et al. (2015) Live to tell: Narratives of methamphetamine-using women taken hostage by their intimate partners in San Diego, CA. Int J Drug Policy 26:843-50|
|Stockman, Jamila K; Hayashi, Hitomi; Campbell, Jacquelyn C (2015) Intimate Partner Violence and its Health Impact on Ethnic Minority Women [corrected]. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 24:62-79|
|Draughon, Jessica E; Lucea, Marguerite B; Campbell, Jacquelyn C et al. (2015) Impact of Intimate Partner Forced Sex on HIV Risk Factors in Physically Abused African American and African Caribbean Women. J Immigr Minor Health 17:1313-21|
|Semple, Shirley J; Stockman, Jamila K; Pitpitan, Eileen V et al. (2015) Prevalence and Correlates of Client-Perpetrated Violence against Female Sex Workers in 13 Mexican Cities. PLoS One 10:e0143317|
|Bergmann, Julie N; Stockman, Jamila K (2015) How does intimate partner violence affect condom and oral contraceptive Use in the United States?: A systematic review of the literature. Contraception 91:438-55|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 13 publications