Prematurity-associated respiratory failure is a growing public health problem. Although mortality has dropped with advances in perinatal care, this condition consumes considerable healthcare resources and is increasingly associated with worrisome long-term morbidity, developmental delay, and family burden. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator that improves short-term outcomes in term neonates with respiratory failure, may benefit premature infants. Consequently, a new NHLBI-funded randomized controlled trial (NHLBI iNO RCT) will assess the effect of iNO on the combined end-point of mortality or oxygen dependency at 36 weeks post conceptional age in 800 infants with prematurity-associated respiratory failure. However, prematurity-associated respiratory failure has a different etiology from respiratory failure in term infants and the wide array of long-term consequences that may be affected by iNO are not captured under the existing study design. We therefore propose to extend and enhance the follow-up of the NHLBI iNO RCT. Specifically, we aim to assess the effects of INO use on: #1. - long-term clinical and childhood developmental outcomes; #2. - family burden, and; #3. - healthcare costs of prematurity-associated respiratory failure.
Under aim #4, we will use data from aims #1-3 to assess the cost-effectiveness of iNO in ventilated premature infants. We will achieve these aims by augmenting the NHLBI iNO RCT data collection with: i.) survival follow-up for an average of 43 years; ii.) comprehensive, standardized follow-up clinic visits at 1,2, 3 and 4V2 years to assess clinical outcomes, childhood development, and family burden; iii.) structured telephone interviews with parents every 3 months in year 1 and every 6 months thereafter for an average of 4? years to assess chronic morbidity and post-discharge healthcare use; iv.) collection of detailed hospital bills for the primary hospitalization, and; v.) a comprehensive analysis plan. This study will allow us to determine the long-term consequences of iNO therapy in this condition, aiding clinicians, families, and policymakers and immediately affecting care of critically ill infants. By combining with the NHLBI iNO RCT, we take advantage of an important opportunity to gather prospective long-term outcome data in a randomized fashion. Our proposal will significantly increase the return on investment in the RCT through a greater understanding of the impact of iNO therapy from a societal perspective. Neonatal intensive care has changed dramatically in the last ten years. This study will also provide contemporary information on the long-term outcomes of prematurity-associated respiratory failure following modern management. Finally, our data will allow assessment of the robustness of early proxies for subsequent outcomes, key for future study design in this area.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01HL069991-05
Application #
7160560
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-SNEM-4 (01))
Program Officer
Blaisdell, Carol J
Project Start
2002-12-15
Project End
2008-11-30
Budget Start
2006-12-07
Budget End
2008-11-30
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2007
Total Cost
$647,031
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pittsburgh
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
004514360
City
Pittsburgh
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
15213
Mourani, Peter M; Kinsella, John P; Clermont, Gilles et al. (2014) Intensive care unit readmission during childhood after preterm birth with respiratory failure. J Pediatr 164:749-755.e3
Watson, R Scott; Clermont, Gilles; Kinsella, John P et al. (2009) Clinical and economic effects of iNO in premature newborns with respiratory failure at 1 year. Pediatrics 124:1333-43
Bryce, Cindy L; Loewenstein, George; Arnold, Robert M et al. (2004) Quality of death: assessing the importance placed on end-of-life treatment in the intensive-care unit. Med Care 42:423-31
Angus, Derek C (2004) Understanding the lingering consequences of what we treat and what we do. Crit Care 8:103-4