Surgery remains a high-risk endeavor, with upwards of 4000 ?never? events per year, and multiple additional opportunities for accidental injuries. Though new surgical technologies are intended to benefit patients, they can introduce unexpected new complexities and error modes for which operating room (OR) teams and host organizations may be unprepared. One of the most ubiquitous exemplars of high-technology surgery is robotic assisted surgery (RAS), which has demonstrated benefit, but also introduces a range of new challenges that place additional stresses on communication, technical and procedural knowledge within the team, and the available space in the operating room. We will evaluate multiple interventions to address these specific challenges, testing new approaches to teamwork training, task design, and workspace management both individually and in combination, at 4 different hospital sites. The effects will be evaluated at individual (use of intervention; workload), process (surgical durations and disruptions) and systems (complications and safety culture) levels. Qualitative interviews and observations will be used to understand the implementation and spread of the interventions. Finally, data from the 680 planned surgical observations ? the largest direct observation study ever conducted ? will be used to model accident causation by exploring the mechanism by which small innocuous process problems concatenate into more serious risks and eventual injuries. This will fundamentally improve our understanding of how innovative surgical technologies can be safely deployed and integrated within complex clinical work systems.

Public Health Relevance

Though new surgical technologies are intended to benefit patients, they can also introduce new stresses on teamwork, technical knowledge, and functional space in the operating room. We will evaluate multiple interventions to address these specific challenges in Robotic Assisted Surgery, studying both whether and how they work and can be spread. This will be the largest study of this kind ever conducted, allowing us to explore the causes of errors in more detail than ever before, and fundamentally improving our ability to make the best use of innovative surgical technologies.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01HS026491-01
Application #
9642879
Study Section
Healthcare Effectiveness and Outcomes Research (HEOR)
Program Officer
Henriksen, Kerm
Project Start
2018-09-30
Project End
2023-07-31
Budget Start
2018-09-30
Budget End
2019-07-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2018
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Medical University of South Carolina
Department
Anesthesiology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
183710748
City
Charleston
State
SC
Country
United States
Zip Code
29403