Financial incentives for motivating changes in health behavior, for weight loss in obese individuals, areincreasingly being tested by health insurers, employers, and government agencies. However, a key unansweredquestion regarding weight loss is how to structure these incentive programs to maximize their (1) effectiveness,underscored by the fact that most programs have not resulted in significant long-term weight loss; and (2)economic sustainability, as defined by their return on investment?a major factor in public and privatedecision-making.Obese patients represent an important population to target for effective weight loss interventions because theysuffer from a high prevalence of serious obesity-related illnesses?including diabetes, hypertension,dyslipidemia, heart disease, stroke, sleep apnea, and cancer?disproportionately have a low socioeconomicstatus, and impose $147 billion in costs on the healthcare system annually. While prior studies testing financialincentives in this population have had variable short-term success and few have yielded long-term weight loss,a fundamental question remains unanswered and may partially explain variability in weight loss outcomes:specifically, it is unknown whether goal-directed incentives (incentives for achieving evidence-based,intermediate goals that increase weight loss but are underutilized, like dietary counseling, physical activity,behavioral self monitoring, and intensive weight management programs) or outcome-based incentives (likeincentives for successfully losing weight) are more effective for promoting weight loss. Prior studies of weightloss incentives have largely emphasized only the latter.We propose a three-arm randomized controlled trial that will address this important knowledge gap amongobese patients living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods, with implications for other seriouschronic health conditions. Comparing goal-directed incentives to outcome-based incentives and usual care, wewill assess their impact on weight loss (?5% of baseline weight), use of evidenced-based therapy, and quality oflife, and evaluate their short-term and long-term return on investment.

Public Health Relevance

Financial incentives for motivating changes in health behavior; particularly for weight loss in obese individuals;are increasingly being tested by health insurers; employers; and government agencies. However; a keyunanswered question regarding weight loss is how to structure these incentive programs to maximize theireffectiveness; acceptability to patients; and economic sustainability. Focusing on obese patients living inneighborhoods with a high concentration of low socioeconomic status households; we will compare the impactof financial incentives for weight loss on sustained weight loss; use of evidenced-based therapy; and quality oflife; and we will determine their short-term and long-term return on investment.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
7R01MD011544-02
Application #
9393159
Study Section
Health Disparities and Equity Promotion Study Section (HDEP)
Program Officer
Castille, Dorothy M
Project Start
2016-09-27
Project End
2021-06-30
Budget Start
2017-02-13
Budget End
2017-06-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2016
Total Cost
$1,490,564
Indirect Cost
$89,666
Name
University of California Los Angeles
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
092530369
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90095
Ladapo, Joseph A; Spritzer, Charles E; Nguyen, Xuan V et al. (2018) Economics of MRI Operations After Implementation of Interpersonal Skills Training. J Am Coll Radiol 15:1775-1783