This project examines the cognitive mechanisms that are responsible for people's ability to understand argumentative prose. In prose of this kind, writers offer a series of sentences that lead to a final conclusion. In order to make sense of such a passage, readers must reconstruct the inferences that connect one sentence to the next, filling in implicit steps and placing explicit ones in proper relationship within the logical structure.
The aim of this proposal is to design and test a theory of this comprehension process. The theory takes the form of a computational model that specifies how people interpret the sentences in an argumentative text, relate them logically to earlier sentences, and store them in memory. The model takes account of textual connectives (e.g., therefore, for, or however) and textual hints about inference methods (e.g., that the conclusion follows by a particular rule or from a previous result). Three groups of proposed experiments test the model's reasoning and memory assumptions by comparing its performance to that of adult subjects. The first group is based on the model's distinction between argumentative steps that are predictable and those that are unpredictable from previous steps; the experiments test this distinction by timing subjects as they comprehend and verify individual text lines. A second group of studies examines how the order of sentences in the text and the textual connectives in the sentences affect subjects' ability to identify the intended logical relations. The final set of experiments probes subjects' recall and recognition of alternative points of view within the global argument structure.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
2R01MH039633-04
Application #
3377527
Study Section
Cognition, Emotion, and Personality Research Review Committee (CEP)
Project Start
1985-09-15
Project End
1992-12-31
Budget Start
1990-01-01
Budget End
1990-12-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
1990
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Chicago
Department
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
225410919
City
Chicago
State
IL
Country
United States
Zip Code
60637
Wynne, Lyman C; Tienari, Pekka; Nieminen, P et al. (2006) I. Genotype-environment interaction in the schizophrenia spectrum: genetic liability and global family ratings in the Finnish Adoption Study. Fam Process 45:419-34
Tienari, Pekka; Wynne, Lyman C; Laksy, Kristian et al. (2003) Genetic boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum: evidence from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 160:1587-94
Tienari, P; Wynne, L C; Moring, J et al. (2000) Finnish adoptive family study: sample selection and adoptee DSM-III-R diagnoses. Acta Psychiatr Scand 101:433-43
Rips, L J; Collins, A (1993) Categories and resemblance. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:468-86
Greene, S B (1992) Multiple explanations for multiply quantified sentences: are multiple models necessary? Psychol Rev 99:184-7;discussion 188-90
Rips, L J (1990) Reasoning. Annu Rev Psychol 41:321-53
Rips, L J (1990) Paralogical reasoning: Evans, Johnson-Laird, and Byrne on liar and truth-teller puzzles. Cognition 36:291-314
Rips, L J; Conrad, F G (1990) Parts of activities: reply to Fellbaum and Miller (1990). Psychol Rev 97:571-5
Rips, L J (1989) The psychology of knights and knaves. Cognition 31:85-116
Rips, L J; Conrad, F G (1989) Folk psychology of mental activities. Psychol Rev 96:187-207