The research program we propose concerns the development of clinical trial methodology, including new experimental designs and methods of statistical analysis, for the study of antipsychotic drugs used in the treatment of schizophrenia: (1) Although """"""""flexible dose"""""""" or """"""""doctor's choice"""""""" designs mirror clinical practice and accommodate individual patient variations they have been seriously criticized. We will develop statistical bioassay models that estimate relative potency while taking into account placebo responders and refractory.patients as well as the dosage information. (2) When the relative potency of a test to a standard is not the same for all behavioral and side effect variables we will develop methods that permit the identification of subgroups of the variables with respect to which relative potency is constant. (3) Generally, the categories within items in a rating scale have implicit rank order quantified by arbitrarily assigning equispaced integer values to the categories. We will develop methods whereby scalar assignments are made on the basis of dose response data from the trial itself. (4) Crossover designs that are efficient and are analyzable whether or not carryover effects are present will be developed so that a relatively small sample size will have adequate power to contrast therapies. (5) Models to analyze multivariate observations for evaluation of the bioequivalence of two treatments through the simultaneous analysis of serum levels of drug and/or metabolites at all of the observation time points will be developed. (6) We shall develop statistical methodology for assessing the merits of combination therapies. The nature of the null hypothesis has led to considerable confusion in the analysis of studies of combination therapy. These usually involve hypotheses of the form HO: combinations not better than A or combination: not better than B. (7) Other statistical problems that arise in consultation and collaborating with clinical researchers will be considered.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH042959-05
Application #
2245626
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (SRCM (23))
Project Start
1988-08-01
Project End
1994-04-30
Budget Start
1992-09-01
Budget End
1994-04-30
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
1992
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Department
Type
DUNS #
167204762
City
Orangeburg
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10962
Laska, E M; Meisner, M; Siegel, C et al. (2001) Statistical cost-effectiveness analysis of two treatments based on net health benefits. Stat Med 20:1279-302
Laska, E M; Meisner, M; Siegel, C (1999) Power and sample size in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making 19:339-43
Laska, E M; Meisner, M; Siegel, C et al. (1999) Ratio-based and net benefit-based approaches to health care resource allocation: proofs of optimality and equivalence. Health Econ 8:171-4
Laska, E M; Meisner, M; Siegel, C (1997) Statistical inference for cost-effectiveness ratios. Health Econ 6:229-42
Laska, E M; Meisner, M; Siegel, C (1997) The usefulness of average cost-effective ratios. Health Econ 6:497-504
Laska, E M; Meisner, M; Tang, D I (1997) Classification of the effectiveness of combination treatments. Stat Med 16:2211-28
Czobor, P; Volavka, J (1996) Dimensions of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: an examination of stability during haloperidol treatment. Compr Psychiatry 37:205-15
Siegel, C; Laska, E; Meisner, M (1996) Statistical methods for cost-effectiveness analyses. Control Clin Trials 17:387-406
Wolkin, A; Sanfilipo, M; Duncan, E et al. (1996) Blunted change in cerebral glucose utilization after haloperidol treatment in schizophrenic patients with prominent negative symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 153:346-54
Czobor, P; Volavka, J (1996) Positive and negative symptoms: is their change related? Schizophr Bull 22:577-90

Showing the most recent 10 out of 23 publications