This research has two related goals: To understand the ways in which the brain represents space, and to explain clinical visual/spatial disorders in terms of the underlying spatial representations that have been impaired by brain damage. The first goal involves characterizing both the functional architecture of spatial representation in terms of the spatial frames of reference (i.e. coordinate systems) used to code spatial position, the relation between the internal spatial structure of objects and their location in space, and the modality-specificity of spatial representations. The investigator also will attempt to localize the representations so delineated by examination of lesion site in patients who are and are not impaired in a particular form of spatial representation. The second goal is to determine which clinically observable visual-spatial disorders (including hemispatial neglect, constructional apraxia, visual disorientation, closure deficits, visual agnosia, topographic disorientation, and disorders of personal space) are attributable to impaired spatial representation (as opposed to impairments in memory or executive processes, for example), and to begin to characterize the nature of the impairment of spatial representation where such an impairment is implicated.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH048274-04
Application #
2248088
Study Section
Cognition, Emotion, and Personality Research Review Committee (CEP)
Project Start
1993-03-05
Project End
1994-09-30
Budget Start
1993-04-01
Budget End
1994-09-30
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
1993
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Vecera, S P; Farah, M J (1997) Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? Percept Psychophys 59:1280-96
Reed, C L; Caselli, R J; Farah, M J (1996) Tactile agnosia. Underlying impairment and implications for normal tactile object recognition. Brain 119 ( Pt 3):875-88
Farah, M J (1996) Is face recognition 'special'? Evidence from neuropsychology. Behav Brain Res 76:181-9
Tippett, L J; Glosser, G; Farah, M J (1996) A category-specific naming impairment after temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia 34:139-46
Tippett, L J; Grossman, M; Farah, M J (1996) The semantic memory impairment of Alzheimer's disease: category-specific? Cortex 32:143-53
Reed, C L; Vinson, N G (1996) Conceptual effects on representational momentum. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:839-50
Farah, M J; Tanaka, J W; Drain, H M (1995) What causes the face inversion effect? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:628-34
Farah, M J; Wilson, K D; Drain, H M et al. (1995) The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Res 35:2089-93
Farah, M J; Levinson, K L; Klein, K L (1995) Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 33:661-74
Tippett, L J; McAuliffe, S; Farah, M J (1995) Preservation of categorical knowledge in Alzheimer's disease: a computational account. Memory 3:519-33

Showing the most recent 10 out of 19 publications